[RESULT][VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 0.99.2 (RC0) is available. Please vote by 12/06/2014

[Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>]

The release vote passed with 4 +1's. I'll continue with the release.

Thanks for testing the RC and voting.

Enis

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <jz...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

>
> +1 due to it's a dev release.
>
> I've downloaded the RC, run it in pseudo cluster mode and works good. The
> issue I hit is when trying to run a integration test and got following
> error:
>
>         java.lang.RuntimeException:
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DistributedHBaseCluster@dd606a not an instance of
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MiniHBaseCluster
>
> I guess it's fixed by HBASE-12617.
>
>
> On 12/5/14, 7:26 PM, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Verified signature and md5.
> >
> >Layout looks right (src and bin).
> >
> >Build it and ran it.  Looks good.
> >
> >I've been running it the last few days on a cluster doing testing and
> >basically works.
> >
> >St.Ack
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> We need at least one more vote for this.
> >>
> >> I had set a shorter (4 days) testing window since this is a
> >>non-production
> >> release. I can extend the voting period if anybody needs it.
> >>
> >> Enis
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Checked the book
> >> > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts
> >> > Ran unit test suite - passed.
> >> >
> >> > Will do some more validation, time permitting.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Setting aside the Interface discussions, here is my +1 for the RC.
> >> > >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > Downloaded artifacts,
> >> > > Checked sigs,
> >> > > Checked crcs,
> >> > > Checked the book
> >> > > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts
> >> > > Checked jars of hbase and hadoop in bin artifact
> >> > > Checked version strings
> >> > > Run in local mode
> >> > > Run basic smoke tests in shell
> >> > > Run LTT
> >> > > Build the src artifact with hadoop versions 2.2.0,2.3.0,2.4.0,
> >>2.5.0.
> >> > > 2.6.0. Compilation with 2.4.0 and before is broken, but it is ok for
> >> > > this RC. See HBASE-12637
> >> > > Checked maven repository artifacts by running the hbase-downstreamer
> >> > > project test.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Reminder, Sat is the last day to vote on this RC. Please plan to
> >>spend
> >> > some
> >> > > time on the RC so that we can iron out issues for the next 1.0.0RC.
> >> > >
> >> > > Enis
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andrew Purtell
> >><ap...@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1501. Pardon
> the
> >> > noise
> >> > > > on
> >> > > > a VOTE thread.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Purtell
> >><apurtell@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Phoenix PMC here, although I'm only speaking my own opinion.
> >> Concur,
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > code takes liberties... We need to clean our own house.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sean Busbey
> >><bu...@cloudera.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > Compiling Phoenix master against 0.99.2, I got:
> >> > > > >> > > http://pastebin.com/gaxCs8fT
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > Some removed methods are in HBase classes that are marked
> >> > > > >> > > with @InterfaceAudience.Private
> >> > > > >> > > I want to get some opinion on whether such methods should
> >>be
> >> > > > >> deprecated
> >> > > > >> > > first.
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> There is no room for 'opinion' in this area. A bunch of work
> >>has
> >> > been
> >> > > > done
> >> > > > >> to remove ambiguity around our guarantees. The law as it stands
> >> is:
> >> > > > >> InterfaceAudience.Private means: "APIs for HBase internals
> >> > developers.
> >> > > > No
> >> > > > >> guarantees on compatibility or availability in future versions.
> >> ..."
> >> > > > (From
> >> > > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#code.standards).  We can add
> >> > > verbiage
> >> > > > >> but
> >> > > > >> you would have to have a perverse squint to interpret this "no
> >> > > > guarantees"
> >> > > > >> as "no guarantees -- after a deprecation cycle".
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> That said, we are an accommodating lot.  I suggest you take the
> >> list
> >> > > > over
> >> > > > >> to phoenix dev and that phoenix comes back with explicit asks
> >> rather
> >> > > > than
> >> > > > >> this blanket list taken from a compile against their master
> >> branch.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> As per Sean, this discussion does not belong on a dev release
> >>RC
> >> > vote
> >> > > > >> thread, nor should it hold up its release.
> >> > > > >> St.Ack
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >    - Andy
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> >>Piet
> >> > > Hein
> >> > > > > (via Tom White)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >    - Andy
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> >>Piet
> >> > Hein
> >> > > > (via Tom White)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>