You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> on 2002/04/19 14:37:43 UTC
1.3.26
Hi all,
I've commited a fix to proxy which allows it to handle the
unexpected-100-continue case that caused it to break when viewing sites
like Hotmail. In addition, fixes were committed to fix the dechunking
support, and so far the proxy seems to work quite well.
Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
fixes to date?
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jos Backus <jo...@catnook.com>.
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:29:23PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:25:39PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> > Anyone interested in picking this up before the next (last?) 1.3 release?
> >
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
>
> I would like to see this go in to 1.3. I will volunteer my time to see
> that this happens (the patch is there, it just needs to be merged), if
> I can get enough support. I realize this might be considered a feature,
> but I think it is something that is needed and will be very useful for
> those who are stuck on 1.3 for the time being.
Thank you very much!
> -aaron
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos@catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:25:39PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> Anyone interested in picking this up before the next (last?) 1.3 release?
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
I would like to see this go in to 1.3. I will volunteer my time to see
that this happens (the patch is there, it just needs to be merged), if
I can get enough support. I realize this might be considered a feature,
but I think it is something that is needed and will be very useful for
those who are stuck on 1.3 for the time being.
-aaron
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
At 12:25 PM -0701 5/13/02, Jos Backus wrote:
>Anyone interested in picking this up before the next (last?) 1.3 release?
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
>
>Please? Thanks!
>
The URL in the bug report (http://lizzy.dyndns.org/~jos/apache-1.3.24-daemontools.patch)
appears bogus.
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jos Backus <jo...@catnook.com>.
Anyone interested in picking this up before the next (last?) 1.3 release?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
Please? Thanks!
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos@catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jos Backus <jo...@catnook.com>.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:01:30PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >Perhaps somebody can look at bug 7628? Please?
>
> That's not a showstopper to rolling .26 - but if someone would update that
> patch
> in contrib it would be appreciated by many, I'm sure.
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
It would be even better if the patch were integrated so we wouldn't have to do
the version chase every time :-) Now when the next version comes out and the
patch doesn't apply I'll have to resubmit another bugreport.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos@catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 01:43 PM 4/19/2002, Jos Backus wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > >
> > >Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
> > >fixes to date?
> > >
> >
> > I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
>
>Perhaps somebody can look at bug 7628? Please?
That's not a showstopper to rolling .26 - but if someone would update that
patch
in contrib it would be appreciated by many, I'm sure.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7628
But while you mention it... the bug report below has a trivial correct fix,
but I don't
have the time to fight my OSX builds right now;
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8176
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
At 11:43 AM -0700 4/19/02, Jos Backus wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> >
>> >Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
>> >fixes to date?
>> >
>>
>> I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
>
>Perhaps somebody can look at bug 7628? Please?
>
7628??
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jos Backus <jo...@catnook.com>.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >
> >Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
> >fixes to date?
> >
>
> I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
Perhaps somebody can look at bug 7628? Please?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos@catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
> At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >
> >Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
> >fixes to date?
> >
>
> I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
My e-mail is back!!!
+1
Bill
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
>Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
>fixes to date?
>
I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> Is this bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8242
> resolved with the other proxy fixes?
The report is pretty vague... but it seems their problem is either the
unexpected-100-continue issue, or it could be the lack of dechunking
issue (thus the "0") - or even both at the same time.
I've been testing proxy against hotmail (which throws unexpected
100-continues) which uses lots of POSTs, and everything works fine.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
Re: 1.3.26
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Is this bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8242
resolved with the other proxy fixes?
At 07:37 AM 4/19/2002, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've commited a fix to proxy which allows it to handle the
>unexpected-100-continue case that caused it to break when viewing sites
>like Hotmail. In addition, fixes were committed to fix the dechunking
>support, and so far the proxy seems to work quite well.
>
>Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
>fixes to date?
>
>Regards,
>Graham
>--
>-----------------------------------------
>minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon
> over Bourbon Street
> tonight..."