You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org by Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@apache.org> on 2017/01/05 23:33:17 UTC

TC 2.0.x branch

As discussed in the traffic-control-cdn#dev slack channel, the plan is to
merge the contents of the postgres branch (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/tree/postgres) to the
master branch by Friday, 1/6/16 end of day and subsequently cut a 2.0.x
branch.

Included in 2.0.x will be any commits applied to master after 1.8.x was cut
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/1.8.x...master

plus, of course, changes made to support Traffic Ops on Postgres.

This also means if you have any outstanding PR's (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls) that you want in
2.0.x, reach out to a committer to get them merged. Otherwise, they will
have to target the 2.1 release.

Questions? Concerns?

thanks.

Re: TC 2.0.x branch

Posted by Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>.
Dan has submitted a PR to merge the postgres branch into master -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/168

In doing so, he had to work through a number of conflicts. I am going to
give his PR a once over and then hopefully merge it today.

Jeremy

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
efriedri@cisco.com> wrote:

> Following some more discussion on Slack, we are still planning to merge
> the postgres branch into master today.
>
> However, we will defer cutting the 2.0 release branch until after the 1.8
> release passes apache incubator voting.
>
> This will cut down on the amount of back porting needed, by keeping the
> number of active branches down.
>
> Any objections?
> —Eric
>
> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Jan van Doorn <jv...@knutsel.com> wrote:
> >
> > We are moving away from MySQL, so from 2.0 on, we only support  Postgres.
> >
> > And, to emphasize, master will be moving to Postgres as well, all
> releases after 2.0 will be Postgres.
> >
> > There will be a migration included that migrates your existing database.
> >
> > Rgds,
> > JvD
> >
> >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
> efriedri@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Will 2.0 still support MySQL or just Postgres?
> >>
> >> Will the 2.0 release include auto-migration from MySQL to Postgres?
> >>
> >> Any other changes coming in that branch other than the move to a
> different DB?
> >>
> >> —Eric
> >>
> >>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As discussed in the traffic-control-cdn#dev slack channel, the plan is
> to
> >>> merge the contents of the postgres branch (
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/tree/postgres) to
> the
> >>> master branch by Friday, 1/6/16 end of day and subsequently cut a 2.0.x
> >>> branch.
> >>>
> >>> Included in 2.0.x will be any commits applied to master after 1.8.x
> was cut
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/
> compare/1.8.x...master
> >>>
> >>> plus, of course, changes made to support Traffic Ops on Postgres.
> >>>
> >>> This also means if you have any outstanding PR's (
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls) that you
> want in
> >>> 2.0.x, reach out to a committer to get them merged. Otherwise, they
> will
> >>> have to target the 2.1 release.
> >>>
> >>> Questions? Concerns?
> >>>
> >>> thanks.
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: TC 2.0.x branch

Posted by "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <ef...@cisco.com>.
Following some more discussion on Slack, we are still planning to merge the postgres branch into master today. 

However, we will defer cutting the 2.0 release branch until after the 1.8 release passes apache incubator voting. 

This will cut down on the amount of back porting needed, by keeping the number of active branches down.

Any objections?
—Eric

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Jan van Doorn <jv...@knutsel.com> wrote:
> 
> We are moving away from MySQL, so from 2.0 on, we only support  Postgres. 
> 
> And, to emphasize, master will be moving to Postgres as well, all releases after 2.0 will be Postgres.
> 
> There will be a migration included that migrates your existing database. 
> 
> Rgds,
> JvD
> 
>> On Jan 6, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <ef...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Will 2.0 still support MySQL or just Postgres?
>> 
>> Will the 2.0 release include auto-migration from MySQL to Postgres?
>> 
>> Any other changes coming in that branch other than the move to a different DB?
>> 
>> —Eric
>> 
>>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As discussed in the traffic-control-cdn#dev slack channel, the plan is to
>>> merge the contents of the postgres branch (
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/tree/postgres) to the
>>> master branch by Friday, 1/6/16 end of day and subsequently cut a 2.0.x
>>> branch.
>>> 
>>> Included in 2.0.x will be any commits applied to master after 1.8.x was cut
>>> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/1.8.x...master
>>> 
>>> plus, of course, changes made to support Traffic Ops on Postgres.
>>> 
>>> This also means if you have any outstanding PR's (
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls) that you want in
>>> 2.0.x, reach out to a committer to get them merged. Otherwise, they will
>>> have to target the 2.1 release.
>>> 
>>> Questions? Concerns?
>>> 
>>> thanks.
>> 
> 


Re: TC 2.0.x branch

Posted by Jan van Doorn <jv...@knutsel.com>.
We are moving away from MySQL, so from 2.0 on, we only support  Postgres. 

And, to emphasize, master will be moving to Postgres as well, all releases after 2.0 will be Postgres.

There will be a migration included that migrates your existing database. 

Rgds,
JvD

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <ef...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Will 2.0 still support MySQL or just Postgres?
> 
> Will the 2.0 release include auto-migration from MySQL to Postgres?
> 
> Any other changes coming in that branch other than the move to a different DB?
> 
> —Eric
> 
>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> As discussed in the traffic-control-cdn#dev slack channel, the plan is to
>> merge the contents of the postgres branch (
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/tree/postgres) to the
>> master branch by Friday, 1/6/16 end of day and subsequently cut a 2.0.x
>> branch.
>> 
>> Included in 2.0.x will be any commits applied to master after 1.8.x was cut
>> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/1.8.x...master
>> 
>> plus, of course, changes made to support Traffic Ops on Postgres.
>> 
>> This also means if you have any outstanding PR's (
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls) that you want in
>> 2.0.x, reach out to a committer to get them merged. Otherwise, they will
>> have to target the 2.1 release.
>> 
>> Questions? Concerns?
>> 
>> thanks.
> 


Re: TC 2.0.x branch

Posted by "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <ef...@cisco.com>.
Will 2.0 still support MySQL or just Postgres?

Will the 2.0 release include auto-migration from MySQL to Postgres?

Any other changes coming in that branch other than the move to a different DB?

—Eric

> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> As discussed in the traffic-control-cdn#dev slack channel, the plan is to
> merge the contents of the postgres branch (
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/tree/postgres) to the
> master branch by Friday, 1/6/16 end of day and subsequently cut a 2.0.x
> branch.
> 
> Included in 2.0.x will be any commits applied to master after 1.8.x was cut
> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/1.8.x...master
> 
> plus, of course, changes made to support Traffic Ops on Postgres.
> 
> This also means if you have any outstanding PR's (
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls) that you want in
> 2.0.x, reach out to a committer to get them merged. Otherwise, they will
> have to target the 2.1 release.
> 
> Questions? Concerns?
> 
> thanks.