You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by "Sqoop QA bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/06/16 22:33:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-1065) Sqoop2: Remove special lock object
in FrameworkManager
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13684781#comment-13684781 ]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-1065:
-------------------------------------
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12585888/bugSQOOP-1065.patch against branch SQOOP-1082.
{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All tests passed
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/18/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Sqoop2: Remove special lock object in FrameworkManager
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1065
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1065
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.99.2
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.99.3
>
> Attachments: bugSQOOP-1065.patch
>
>
> {{FrameworkManager}} is currently using special lock object to ensure that we are not running one job multiple times. I think that using a special object is redundant as we can use any other immutable object like the class itself.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira