cas-product .war artifact huge

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi Folks,
Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in size?
Lewis

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: cas-product .war artifact huge

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

As a wannabe hacker ;) of OODT sometimes I find build downloads timing
out... this has been observed on Jenkins as well.
Any mechanism for reducing the size of this particular artefact would be
very helpful. I notice that cxf is pulled transitively via some hadoop
artifacts as well so I'm also very much guilty of pulling then being left
with the task of cleaning up project builds.
Thanks for anything you can do here Ross. Great.
Lewis.
On Jul 3, 2014 7:44 PM, "Ross Laidlaw" <rl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Chris & Lewis,
>
> I think Chris is right, probably it's the Apache CXF dependencies that
> have increased the WAR size.  As Chris suggested, I'll try to learn about
> Sergey's solution for Tika to see if we can do something similar for the
> CAS Product webapp.
>
> Ross
>
>
>
> > On 1 Jul 2014, at 04:54, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should consider that.
> > That is a bit of a beast and is a waste of resources, storage and
> bandwidth
> > if it is not required.
> > If we can avoid this then I think we should.
> > Thanks for response.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Chris Mattmann <
> chris.mattmann@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @Ross Laidlaw can answer this - I'm thinking the CXF integration?
> >> Note -- this can be adapted as Sergey B in Tika has shown in some
> >> thread that we can just dep on the minimal jar for CXF
> >>
> >> ------------------------
> >> Chris Mattmann
> >> chris.mattmann@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
> >> Reply-To: <de...@oodt.apache.org>
> >> Date: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:10 PM
> >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <de...@oodt.apache.org>
> >> Subject: cas-product .war artifact huge
> >>
> >>> Hi Folks,
> >>> Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in
> size?
> >>> Lewis
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Lewis*
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
>

Re: cas-product .war artifact huge

[Ross Laidlaw <rl...@gmail.com>]

Hi Chris & Lewis,

I think Chris is right, probably it's the Apache CXF dependencies that have increased the WAR size.  As Chris suggested, I'll try to learn about Sergey's solution for Tika to see if we can do something similar for the CAS Product webapp. 

Ross



> On 1 Jul 2014, at 04:54, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think we should consider that.
> That is a bit of a beast and is a waste of resources, storage and bandwidth
> if it is not required.
> If we can avoid this then I think we should.
> Thanks for response.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Chris Mattmann <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> @Ross Laidlaw can answer this - I'm thinking the CXF integration?
>> Note -- this can be adapted as Sergey B in Tika has shown in some
>> thread that we can just dep on the minimal jar for CXF
>> 
>> ------------------------
>> Chris Mattmann
>> chris.mattmann@gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: <de...@oodt.apache.org>
>> Date: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:10 PM
>> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <de...@oodt.apache.org>
>> Subject: cas-product .war artifact huge
>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in size?
>>> Lewis
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *Lewis*
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Lewis*

Re: cas-product .war artifact huge

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

I think we should consider that.
That is a bit of a beast and is a waste of resources, storage and bandwidth
if it is not required.
If we can avoid this then I think we should.
Thanks for response.


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Chris Mattmann <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> @Ross Laidlaw can answer this - I'm thinking the CXF integration?
> Note -- this can be adapted as Sergey B in Tika has shown in some
> thread that we can just dep on the minimal jar for CXF
>
> ------------------------
> Chris Mattmann
> chris.mattmann@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: <de...@oodt.apache.org>
> Date: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:10 PM
> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <de...@oodt.apache.org>
> Subject: cas-product .war artifact huge
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in size?
> >Lewis
> >
> >--
> >*Lewis*
>
>
>


-- 
*Lewis*

Re: cas-product .war artifact huge

[Chris Mattmann <ch...@gmail.com>]

@Ross Laidlaw can answer this - I'm thinking the CXF integration?
Note -- this can be adapted as Sergey B in Tika has shown in some
thread that we can just dep on the minimal jar for CXF

------------------------
Chris Mattmann
chris.mattmann@gmail.com




-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <de...@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:10 PM
To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <de...@oodt.apache.org>
Subject: cas-product .war artifact huge

>Hi Folks,
>Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in size?
>Lewis
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*