You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> on 2020/05/12 08:00:46 UTC
[VOTE] FLIP-126: FLIP-126: Unify (and separate) Watermark Assigners
Hi all,
I would like to start the vote for FLIP-126 [1], which is discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2].
The vote will be open until May 15th (72h), unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
Best,
Aljoscha
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-126%3A+Unify+%28and+separate%29+Watermark+Assigners
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7988ddfe5ca8d85e666039cf6240e1007a2ca337a52108f684b66d90%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-126: FLIP-126: Unify (and separate) Watermark
Assigners
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
The voting time for FLIP-126 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
Including my implicit vote, there were 3 + 1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
- Stephan (binding)
- Dawid (binding)
- Aljoscha (binding)
There were no -1 votes.
Thus, changes have been accepted. I'll update the FLIP doc accordingly.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-126%3A+Unify+%28and+separate%29+Watermark+Assigners
Best,
Aljoscha
On 12.05.20 18:28, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
> On 12/05/2020 15:49, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>> +1 from me
>>
>> There are discussions about minor changes (names and serializability)
>> pending, but these should not conflict with the design here.
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:01 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-126 [1], which is discussed and
>>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open until May 15th (72h), unless there is an objection
>>> or not enough votes.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Aljoscha
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-126%3A+Unify+%28and+separate%29+Watermark+Assigners
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7988ddfe5ca8d85e666039cf6240e1007a2ca337a52108f684b66d90%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-126: FLIP-126: Unify (and separate) Watermark
Assigners
Posted by Dawid Wysakowicz <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 from me
Best,
Dawid
On 12/05/2020 15:49, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> There are discussions about minor changes (names and serializability)
> pending, but these should not conflict with the design here.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:01 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-126 [1], which is discussed and
>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2].
>>
>> The vote will be open until May 15th (72h), unless there is an objection
>> or not enough votes.
>>
>> Best,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-126%3A+Unify+%28and+separate%29+Watermark+Assigners
>>
>> [2]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7988ddfe5ca8d85e666039cf6240e1007a2ca337a52108f684b66d90%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-126: FLIP-126: Unify (and separate) Watermark Assigners
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
+1 from me
There are discussions about minor changes (names and serializability)
pending, but these should not conflict with the design here.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:01 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-126 [1], which is discussed and
> reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open until May 15th (72h), unless there is an objection
> or not enough votes.
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-126%3A+Unify+%28and+separate%29+Watermark+Assigners
>
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7988ddfe5ca8d85e666039cf6240e1007a2ca337a52108f684b66d90%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>