You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Mario Pastorelli (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/01 00:02:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4376) Introduce a Builders for "data" classes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15453798#comment-15453798 ] 

Mario Pastorelli commented on ACCUMULO-4376:
--------------------------------------------

[PR 145|https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145] opened for the key builder.

> Introduce a Builders for "data" classes
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4376
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In looking at ACCUMULO-4375, I was a little frustrated at how we have 3x constructors than Key really provides just to support {{byte[]}}, {{Text}}, and {{CharSequence}} arguments. Additionally, the {{copy}} argument forces the user to use the most specific (most arguments) constructor if they want to avoid the copy. This makes constructing a Key from just a row while avoiding a copy very pedantic.
> I think a KeyBuilder (or KeyFactory) class would be a big usability benefit and reduce the amount of code that clients have to write to most efficiently construct Keys.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)