You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com> on 2002/02/21 16:41:12 UTC
New ServiceManager under proposition
Love it!
There is some mention of 'component' in the DefaultServiceManager. I am
not sure whether that is deliberate or accidental....
What is the plan? Vote or mull some more?
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Folks,
>>With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
>>up the version to 4.1.3 ?
>>
>
>+1
>
>We could do another point release of just the framework part. We may want to
>leave it for a week or so just to work out any kinks or so. I integrated it
>into the ant proposal and all looked good.
>
+1 Good point. We can still push it from src/proposal to src/java though.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 04:30, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Pete:
>
> With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
> up the version to 4.1.3 ?
+1
We could do another point release of just the framework part. We may want to
leave it for a week or so just to work out any kinks or so. I integrated it
into the ant proposal and all looked good.
--
Cheers,
Pete
Frank Zappa observed: "It's not getting any smarter out
there.You have to come to terms with
stupidity, and make it work for you."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:bloritsch@apache.org]
> Sent: den 21 februari 2002 19:25
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: New ServiceManager under proposition
>
>
> Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > Pete:
> >
> > With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
> > up the version to 4.1.3 ?
>
>
> 4.2
>
> That is significant enough of a change.
+1
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > Pete:
> >
> > With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
> > up the version to 4.1.3 ?
>
>
> 4.2
>
> That is significant enough of a change.
+1
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Pete:
>
> With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
> up the version to 4.1.3 ?
4.2
That is significant enough of a change.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
Pete:
With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we
up the version to 4.1.3 ?
Steve.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 18:08
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: RE: New ServiceManager under proposition
>
>
>
> Paul:
> Consider it accidental. The only reference to Component was
> getComponents. I've changed this getObjects as per all other
> xxxComponent interfaces and implementation signatures. Also purged the
> component word in the documentation, and updated Phoenix lib directory
> with the latest version of the framework and the updated
> LifecycleHelper class.
> Steve.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 16:41
> > To: Avalon Development
> > Subject: New ServiceManager under proposition
> >
> >
> > Love it!
> >
> > There is some mention of 'component' in the
> DefaultServiceManager. I am
> > not sure whether that is deliberate or accidental....
> >
> > What is the plan? Vote or mull some more?
> >
> > - Paul
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: New ServiceManager under proposition
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@apache.org>.
Paul:
Consider it accidental. The only reference to Component was
getComponents. I've changed this getObjects as per all other
xxxComponent interfaces and implementation signatures. Also purged the
component word in the documentation, and updated Phoenix lib directory
with the latest version of the framework and the updated
LifecycleHelper class.
Steve.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 16:41
> To: Avalon Development
> Subject: New ServiceManager under proposition
>
>
> Love it!
>
> There is some mention of 'component' in the DefaultServiceManager. I am
> not sure whether that is deliberate or accidental....
>
> What is the plan? Vote or mull some more?
>
> - Paul
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>