You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by Sebastian Rühl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID> on 2019/11/28 11:13:56 UTC

AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Short notice:

I continue working on the mspec for ams/ads and need therefore some new features.
The protocol-base-mspec is missing tests so I will add them in this brach too
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec <https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec>


Sebastian

Re: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Posted by Sebastian Rühl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Thx Julian :)

I thought about it but haven’t taken care of it till yet.
But if I get the orga stuff arranged I would like to come… so maybe, maybe not ;)

Sebastian

> Am 29.11.2019 um 11:40 schrieb Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>:
> 
> Welcome Back Sebastian (
> Do you plan to join our Hack-Session in December?
> 
> Julian
> 
> Am 28.11.19, 12:27 schrieb "Sebastian Rühl" <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:
> 
>    Hi Chris,
> 
>    Sure that, I will try out some stuff anyway but two things I would like to have:
> 
>    1. predefined constants for fields (for example address values uint8 which there are some reserved values). This could be then public static final int fields in java for example
>    2. Support for bit masks
> 
>    You can view the current (syntactic wrong) mspec In the branch below
> 
>    Sebastian 
> 
>> Am 28.11.2019 um 12:22 schrieb Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>> 
>> Hi Sebastian,
>> 
>> How about discussing them here first?
>> 
>> Would like to prevent excessive extending, perhaps some times there is already another way to achieve what you want. Especially as you're just starting with the whole mspec and code generation thing.
>> 
>> Chris
>> ________________________________
>> Von: Sebastian R?hl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2019 12:13:56
>> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
>> Betreff: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec
>> 
>> Short notice:
>> 
>> I continue working on the mspec for ams/ads and need therefore some new features.
>> The protocol-base-mspec is missing tests so I will add them in this brach too
>> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec <https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec>
>> 
>> 
>> Sebastian
> 
> 
>

Re: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Posted by Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>.
Welcome Back Sebastian (
Do you plan to join our Hack-Session in December?

Julian

Am 28.11.19, 12:27 schrieb "Sebastian Rühl" <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:

    Hi Chris,
    
    Sure that, I will try out some stuff anyway but two things I would like to have:
    
    1. predefined constants for fields (for example address values uint8 which there are some reserved values). This could be then public static final int fields in java for example
    2. Support for bit masks
    
    You can view the current (syntactic wrong) mspec In the branch below
    
    Sebastian 
    
    > Am 28.11.2019 um 12:22 schrieb Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
    > 
    > Hi Sebastian,
    > 
    > How about discussing them here first?
    > 
    > Would like to prevent excessive extending, perhaps some times there is already another way to achieve what you want. Especially as you're just starting with the whole mspec and code generation thing.
    > 
    > Chris
    > ________________________________
    > Von: Sebastian R?hl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>
    > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2019 12:13:56
    > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
    > Betreff: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec
    > 
    > Short notice:
    > 
    > I continue working on the mspec for ams/ads and need therefore some new features.
    > The protocol-base-mspec is missing tests so I will add them in this brach too
    > https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec <https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec>
    > 
    > 
    > Sebastian

Re: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Posted by Sebastian Rühl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Hi Chris,

Sure that, I will try out some stuff anyway but two things I would like to have:

1. predefined constants for fields (for example address values uint8 which there are some reserved values). This could be then public static final int fields in java for example
2. Support for bit masks

You can view the current (syntactic wrong) mspec In the branch below

Sebastian 

> Am 28.11.2019 um 12:22 schrieb Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> 
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> How about discussing them here first?
> 
> Would like to prevent excessive extending, perhaps some times there is already another way to achieve what you want. Especially as you're just starting with the whole mspec and code generation thing.
> 
> Chris
> ________________________________
> Von: Sebastian R?hl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2019 12:13:56
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
> Betreff: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec
> 
> Short notice:
> 
> I continue working on the mspec for ams/ads and need therefore some new features.
> The protocol-base-mspec is missing tests so I will add them in this brach too
> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec <https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec>
> 
> 
> Sebastian

AW: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Sebastian,

How about discussing them here first?

Would like to prevent excessive extending, perhaps some times there is already another way to achieve what you want. Especially as you're just starting with the whole mspec and code generation thing.

Chris
________________________________
Von: Sebastian R?hl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2019 12:13:56
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: AMS/ADS mspec and tests for protocol-base-mspec

Short notice:

I continue working on the mspec for ams/ads and need therefore some new features.
The protocol-base-mspec is missing tests so I will add them in this brach too
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec <https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/ams_ads_mpsec>


Sebastian