You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Jaryzhen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/15 09:26:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5601) Window operator does not checkpoint watermarks

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17015751#comment-17015751 ] 

Jaryzhen commented on FLINK-5601:
---------------------------------

hi [~wind_ljy] Any new process on this issue?  I have the same problem on our production business.

> Window operator does not checkpoint watermarks
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5601
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>            Assignee: Jiayi Liao
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> During release testing [~stefanrichter83@gmail.com] and I noticed that watermarks are not checkpointed in the window operator.
> This can lead to non determinism when restoring checkpoints. I was running an adjusted {{SessionWindowITCase}} via Kafka for testing migration and rescaling and ran into failures, because the data generator required determinisitic behaviour.
> What happened was that on restore it could happen that late elements were not dropped, because the watermarks needed to be re-established after restore first.
> [~aljoscha] Do you know whether there is a special reason for explicitly not checkpointing watermarks?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)