[jira] [Created] (LEGAL-595) Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency

["Chris Nauroth (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Chris Nauroth created LEGAL-595:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency
                 Key: LEGAL-595
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-595
             Project: Legal Discuss
          Issue Type: Question
            Reporter: Chris Nauroth


In ZOOKEEPER-4427, Apache ZooKeeper is considering adoption of Logback for logging infrastructure. Logback is dual-licensed under LGPL (category X/disallowed) and EPL (category B/allowable) [1].

Does ZooKeeper need to do something specific to indicate that it chooses to adopt the terms of EPL, and not LGPL? Do we need particular phrasing in the ZooKeeper NOTICE.txt [2] to record our choice of EPL?

[1] https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
[2] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/master/zookeeper-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE.txt



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org