You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/26 15:21:08 UTC
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-m2
so now that 3040 and 3042 are fixed will m3 or a rerelease of m2 be put up
somewhere so we can vote or ?
2010/9/12 Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>
> True, I remember that one (I thought the same thing while writing the
> message above). There's a difference in version number: milestone has
> a different connotation than release candidate. Folks won't start
> asking questions about a missing release candidate as it is supposed
> to live as a release for typeically no more than a short time (and be
> superceded by another release candidate or the final release). A
> milestone marks the completion of some particular feature or features,
> and is typically not quickly replaced with another milestone.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > I really don't care *that much* about which we do. I was only citing
> > Martijn's past suggestion that we not build two different releases with
> the
> > same number:
> >
> >
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/1-4-rc3-need-help-testing-tp1908854p1908862.html
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd just use m2 since it is actually the second milestone. As this was
> >> never released only those living on the bleeding edge have to flush
> >> the failed build. And they'd better follow dev@.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > bleh. 1.5-m2.1 ? we didnt really skip a milestone :)
> >> >
> >> > -igor
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> >> I revert my vote to -1 - do not release, pending the resolution of
> 3040
> >> and
> >> >> 3042.
> >> >>
> >> >> As a side note, I believe that we should not re-use this release
> number,
> >> but
> >> >> our next release should instead be a vote to release 1.5-m3, as has
> been
> >> >> customary for our team in the past on 'failed' releases.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> >> jeremy@wickettraining.com
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> [X] Yes, release
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >>> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-m2
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
Ahh missed the part about trunk...
2010/10/27 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > but what about 1.5?
> >
> > 2010/10/26 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
> > > I'm planning on cutting releases of trunk and 1.4.x tonight as long as
> > > everything builds and tests fine.
> >
>
> As quoted above, I was *planning* on cutting the *trunk* (1.5) and 1.4.x
> releases last night. Unfortunately, as you can see by 1.4.13 the vote
> originating around 2:00am my time, not all plans worked out so well.
>
> "The best laid schemes of mice and men / Go oft awry" -
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Of_Mice_and_Men
>
> Hopefully later today / tonight I can do a 1.5-m3 release.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://wickettraining.com
> *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
>
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-m2
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
> but what about 1.5?
>
> 2010/10/26 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
> > I'm planning on cutting releases of trunk and 1.4.x tonight as long as
> > everything builds and tests fine.
>
As quoted above, I was *planning* on cutting the *trunk* (1.5) and 1.4.x
releases last night. Unfortunately, as you can see by 1.4.13 the vote
originating around 2:00am my time, not all plans worked out so well.
"The best laid schemes of mice and men / Go oft awry" -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Of_Mice_and_Men
Hopefully later today / tonight I can do a 1.5-m3 release.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-m2
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
but what about 1.5?
2010/10/26 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > so now that 3040 and 3042 are fixed will m3 or a rerelease of m2 be put
> up
> > somewhere so we can vote or ?
> >
> >
> I'm planning on cutting releases of trunk and 1.4.x tonight as long as
> everything builds and tests fine.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://wickettraining.com
> *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
>
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-m2
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
> so now that 3040 and 3042 are fixed will m3 or a rerelease of m2 be put up
> somewhere so we can vote or ?
>
>
I'm planning on cutting releases of trunk and 1.4.x tonight as long as
everything builds and tests fine.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*