You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> on 2020/09/24 12:13:15 UTC

[VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Hi, all

After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.

The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there is
an objection or not enough votes.

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API

Best,
Guowei

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>.
I have to correct the vote result as following:

There were 5 votes, 3 of which are binding:

- Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
- Steven Wu
- Kostas Kloudas (binding)
- Jingsong Li (binding)
- Jiangang Liu

Changes still have been accepted.

Sorry to disturb everyone!

Best,
Guowei


On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:11 AM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The voting time for FLIP-143 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
>
> There were 5 votes, 4 of which are binding:
>
> - Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
> - Steven Wu
> - Kostas Kloudas (binding)
> - Jingsong Li (binding)
> - Jiangang Liu (binding)
>
> There were no -1 votes.
>
> Thus, changes have been accepted. I'll update the FLIP doc accordingly.
>
> There is still a discussion about the `CommitResult/GlobaCommitter
> interface, which we could do more discussion at the implementation phase.
>
> Thanks everyone for participating and discussing
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:32 PM 刘建刚 <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Liu Jiangang
>>
>> Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月29日周二 下午1:36写道：
>>
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Jingsong
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas <kk...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (binding)
>> > >
>> > > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
>> > > during the implementation.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Kostas
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
>> > > > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the
>> implementation
>> > > phase.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <
>> aljoscha@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Aljoscha
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
>> > > > > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on
>> > providing
>> > > an
>> > > > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to
>> > > "Unified
>> > > > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could
>> not be
>> > > > > opened
>> > > > > > again.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > Guowei
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <guowei.mgw@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hi, all
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting
>> thread
>> > > for
>> > > > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend),
>> unless
>> > > there
>> > > > > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> [1]
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > >> [2]
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > >> Guowei
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best, Jingsong Lee
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,

The voting time for FLIP-143 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.

There were 5 votes, 4 of which are binding:

- Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
- Steven Wu
- Kostas Kloudas (binding)
- Jingsong Li (binding)
- Jiangang Liu (binding)

There were no -1 votes.

Thus, changes have been accepted. I'll update the FLIP doc accordingly.

There is still a discussion about the `CommitResult/GlobaCommitter
interface, which we could do more discussion at the implementation phase.

Thanks everyone for participating and discussing

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ

Best,
Guowei


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:32 PM 刘建刚 <li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Liu Jiangang
>
> Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月29日周二 下午1:36写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingsong
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas <kk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
> > > during the implementation.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Kostas
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
> > > > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation
> > > phase.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > >
> > > > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
> > > > > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on
> > providing
> > > an
> > > > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to
> > > "Unified
> > > > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not
> be
> > > > > opened
> > > > > > again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Guowei
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi, all
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting
> thread
> > > for
> > > > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend),
> unless
> > > there
> > > > > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >> [2]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >> Guowei
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best, Jingsong Lee
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by 刘建刚 <li...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

Best,
Liu Jiangang

Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月29日周二 下午1:36写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Jingsong
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas <kk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
> > during the implementation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kostas
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
> > > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation
> > phase.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
> > > > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on
> providing
> > an
> > > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to
> > "Unified
> > > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be
> > > > opened
> > > > > again.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Guowei
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, all
> > > > >>
> > > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread
> > for
> > > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless
> > there
> > > > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > >> [2]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Guowei
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

Best,
Jingsong

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas <kk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
> during the implementation.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
> > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation
> phase.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
> > > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing
> an
> > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to
> "Unified
> > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be
> > > opened
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Guowei
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, all
> > > >>
> > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread
> for
> > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless
> there
> > > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > >> [2]
> > > >>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Guowei
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>


-- 
Best, Jingsong Lee

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Kostas Kloudas <kk...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

@Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
during the implementation.

Cheers,
Kostas

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
> CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation phase.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Aljoscha
> >
> > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
> > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an
> > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified
> > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be
> > opened
> > > again.
> > >
> > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Guowei
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, all
> > >>
> > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
> > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there
> > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Guowei
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Steven Wu <st...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation phase.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Aljoscha
>
> On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
> >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an
> > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified
> > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be
> opened
> > again.
> >
> > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> >
> > Best,
> > Guowei
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, all
> >>
> >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
> >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
> >>
> >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there
> >> is an objection or not enough votes.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Guowei
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)

Aljoscha

On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
>  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an
> unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified
> Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be opened
> again.
> 
> I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
> 
> Best,
> Guowei
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi, all
>>
>> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
>> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
>>
>> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there
>> is an objection or not enough votes.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> [2]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
>>
>> Best,
>> Guowei
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

Posted by Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com>.
From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an
unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified
Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be opened
again.

I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ

Best,
Guowei


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, all
>
> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
>
> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there
> is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>