You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> on 2017/01/08 03:51:16 UTC

[complex] Drop "ComplexFormat"?

Hi.

Does a such a formatting class belong to the component?
IIRC they were issues with number formatting classes in
Commons Math.  IMO, in a low-level library, the default
(full precision) output from the JVM will always be needed.

I think that formatting is a better fit for, say, [TEXT].

Regards,
Gilles


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: [complex] Drop "ComplexFormat"?

Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:09:31 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote:
> This is fine with me and absent other objections I will take it out.

FTR, I've created
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-57

Regards,
Gilles

>
> Eric
> On 8 Jan 2017 04:51, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Does a such a formatting class belong to the component?
>> IIRC they were issues with number formatting classes in
>> Commons Math.  IMO, in a low-level library, the default
>> (full precision) output from the JVM will always be needed.
>>
>> I think that formatting is a better fit for, say, [TEXT].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: [complex] Drop "ComplexFormat"?

Posted by Eric Barnhill <er...@gmail.com>.
This is fine with me and absent other objections I will take it out.

Eric
On 8 Jan 2017 04:51, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Does a such a formatting class belong to the component?
> IIRC they were issues with number formatting classes in
> Commons Math.  IMO, in a low-level library, the default
> (full precision) output from the JVM will always be needed.
>
> I think that formatting is a better fit for, say, [TEXT].
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>