You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2015/12/28 19:26:22 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Hi all,
I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
Result thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
The vote is open for 72 hours:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
You might also want to look at [1]. From a quick look I think you are also also missing a disclaimer.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>.
Hi John,
> Le 29 déc. 2015 à 00:24, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi Serge,
>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:58 PM Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Niall (and Daniel),
>>
>> Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed
>> quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have
>> remembered it. I also feel partly responsible for this because I setup the
>> initial build project and didn’t do this initially.
> I'm not sure who Roy is. Maybe you could share a link to some email?
> Hopefully we're not coming across too tough here :-(
I was talking about this email from Roy Fielding that Niall referenced here: http://s.apache.org/srcrel but it's not really important.
>
>
>> JB has been really working hard on helping this project getting off the
>> ground and it’s a shame this was caught so late (but it’s good that it was
>> caught nonetheless). I’d like to keep him as motivated as possible so I
>> take the opportunity to thank him here for all his hard work.
>
> JB's a great guy to have on any project.
+1 :)
>
>
>>
>> What is the best next step now ? Retract the release and build a source
>> package and resubmit that for approval ? Wait for the vote to complete and
>> get rejected, build a source package and re-open a vote for approval ?
>
> You kind of have to in this case. You don't have a valid release. We vote
> on the source release, the binary release is a convenience for end users so
> they don't need to compile the sources.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Serge…
>>
>>>> On 28 déc. 2015, at 21:28, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
>>>> for other project.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
>>>>
>>>> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
>>>>
>>>> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
>>>> will include a source artifacts.
>>>
>>> "The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software.
>>> Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the
>>> necessary source code to build the project."
>>>
>>> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
>>>
>>> So, yes its a complete blocker.
>>>
>>> Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel
>>>
>>> Niall
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
>>>>>> helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
>>>>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may
>> not
>>>>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
>>>>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open
>> source."
>>>>>
>>>>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
>>>>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
>>>>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
>>>>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>>>>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm
>> not
>>>>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7
>> +1s.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual
>>>>>>>>> tests,
>>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails
>> you
>>>>>>>>> referenced.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>> Daniel.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
You might want to double check LICENSE and NOTICE files as well before calling for another vote. From a quick look I see Apache, MIT, BSD license software mentioned in the NOTICE when it should not be. Please see [1][2][3]. Also the second bit about NOTICE contents bubbling up would also apply here [4].
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi Serge,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:58 PM Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com> wrote:
> Hello Niall (and Daniel),
>
> Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed
> quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have
> remembered it. I also feel partly responsible for this because I setup the
> initial build project and didn’t do this initially.
>
>
I'm not sure who Roy is. Maybe you could share a link to some email?
Hopefully we're not coming across too tough here :-(
> JB has been really working hard on helping this project getting off the
> ground and it’s a shame this was caught so late (but it’s good that it was
> caught nonetheless). I’d like to keep him as motivated as possible so I
> take the opportunity to thank him here for all his hard work.
>
JB's a great guy to have on any project.
>
> What is the best next step now ? Retract the release and build a source
> package and resubmit that for approval ? Wait for the vote to complete and
> get rejected, build a source package and re-open a vote for approval ?
>
You kind of have to in this case. You don't have a valid release. We vote
on the source release, the binary release is a convenience for end users so
they don't need to compile the sources.
>
> Regards,
> Serge…
>
> > On 28 déc. 2015, at 21:28, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
> >> for other project.
> >>
> >> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
> >>
> >> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
> >>
> >> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
> >> will include a source artifacts.
> >>
> >
> > "The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software.
> > Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the
> > necessary source code to build the project."
> >
> > See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
> >
> > So, yes its a complete blocker.
> >
> > Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel
> >
> > Niall
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
> >>>>
> >>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
> >>>> helps.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
> >>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
> >>>
> >>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
> >>>
> >>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may
> not
> >>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
> >>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open
> source."
> >>>
> >>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
> >>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
> >>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
> >>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
> >>>
> >>> With regards,
> >>> Daniel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
> >>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
> >>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm
> not
> >>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With regards,
> >>>>> Daniel.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7
> +1s.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Vote thread:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Result thread:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual
> >>>>>>> tests,
> >>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails
> you
> >>>>>>> referenced.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> With regards,
> >>>>>>> Daniel.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>.
Hello Niall (and Daniel),
Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have remembered it. I also feel partly responsible for this because I setup the initial build project and didn’t do this initially.
JB has been really working hard on helping this project getting off the ground and it’s a shame this was caught so late (but it’s good that it was caught nonetheless). I’d like to keep him as motivated as possible so I take the opportunity to thank him here for all his hard work.
What is the best next step now ? Retract the release and build a source package and resubmit that for approval ? Wait for the vote to complete and get rejected, build a source package and re-open a vote for approval ?
Regards,
Serge…
> On 28 déc. 2015, at 21:28, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
>> for other project.
>>
>> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
>>
>> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
>>
>> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
>> will include a source artifacts.
>>
>
> "The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software.
> Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the
> necessary source code to build the project."
>
> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
>
> So, yes its a complete blocker.
>
> Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel
>
> Niall
>
>
>>
>> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>>>>
>>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
>>>> helps.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
>>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
>>>
>>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
>>>
>>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not
>>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
>>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open source."
>>>
>>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
>>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
>>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
>>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
>>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual
>>>>>>> tests,
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>>>>>> referenced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Fair enough,
I cancel this vote to prepare a new release containing src distro.
Regards
JB
On 12/28/2015 09:28 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
>> for other project.
>>
>> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
>>
>> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
>>
>> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
>> will include a source artifacts.
>>
>
> "The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software.
> Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the
> necessary source code to build the project."
>
> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
>
> So, yes its a complete blocker.
>
> Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel
>
> Niall
>
>
>>
>> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>>>>
>>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
>>>> helps.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
>>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
>>>
>>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
>>>
>>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not
>>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
>>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open source."
>>>
>>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
>>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
>>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
>>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
>>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual
>>>>>>> tests,
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>>>>>> referenced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
> for other project.
>
> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
>
> (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
>
> Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
> will include a source artifacts.
>
"The Apache Software Foundation exists to create open source software.
Thus, the fundamental requirement for a release is that it consist of the
necessary source code to build the project."
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
So, yes its a complete blocker.
Also worth reading: http://s.apache.org/srcrel
Niall
>
> Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>>>
>>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>>>
>>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
>>> helps.
>>>
>>
>> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
>> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
>>
>> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
>>
>> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not
>> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
>> components are not open source, even if they were built from open source."
>>
>> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
>> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
>> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
>> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
>>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>>>
>>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>>>
>>>> With regards,
>>>> Daniel.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual
>>>>>> tests,
>>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>>>>> referenced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
My bad, I forgot to include unomi-xxxx-src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
for other project.
Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
(I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read).
Let see what the others think about that. If we consider as blocker, I
will include a source artifacts.
Anyway, I will add the source artifacts for 1.0.1-incubating release.
Regards
JB
On 12/28/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>>
>> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>>
>> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
>> helps.
>
> I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
> source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
>
> I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
>
> "Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not
> contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
> components are not open source, even if they were built from open source."
>
> This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
> podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
> One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
> in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
>>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>>
>>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
>>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>>>> referenced.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
>
> It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
>
> Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it
> helps.
I'd prefer what other projects produce - a source release that contains
source only, no binary applications. I cannot vote on a binary release.
I'll refer to the Incubator release draft[1] which reasons:
"Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not
contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled
components are not open source, even if they were built from open source."
This also begs the question of how you managed to get approval in the
podling to do this release if you have not voted on a source package.
One would think this is a do-over with a source package to be voted on
in the podling and then passed to the IPMC for approval.
With regards,
Daniel.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
>> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
>> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
>> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>>
>> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>
>> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
>>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>>> referenced.
>>>>
>>>> With regards,
>>>> Daniel.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution.
It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime.
Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it helps.
Regards
JB
On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
> however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
> couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
> about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
>
> Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>>
>>
>> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>>
>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Vote thread:
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Result thread:
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>
>>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
>>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>>> referenced.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
Thanks Jean-Baptiste,
however....there are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I
couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not
about to go reverse engineer it to find out.
Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 12/28/2015 07:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> sorry, it's on the staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
>
>
> I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>>
>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>>
>>> Vote thread:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> Result thread:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>
>> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
>> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
>> referenced.
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Daniel,
sorry, it's on the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/
I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass.
Regards
JB
On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>>
>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>>
>> Vote thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>>
>> Result thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>
> Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
> but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
> referenced.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote.
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5679AACE.1080902@nanthrax.net%3E
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3C5680CAAF.7080304%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
Where are the release artifacts located? I'd like to do my usual tests,
but I can't seem to find any tarballs or the likes in the emails you
referenced.
With regards,
Daniel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org