You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au> on 2003/03/19 15:05:38 UTC
Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?
I'd like to get Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 out pretty soon and gve it a couple of weeks
to get tested. Something like a Beta by 24th and two week's beta period.
Are there are any remaining showstopper bugs in Ant 1.5.2?
Thoughts?
If any committers would be keen to be the release manager, please speak up :-)
Conor
--
Conor MacNeill
Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/
Re: Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?
Posted by Magesh Umasankar <um...@apache.org>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Conor MacNeill" <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
> I'd like to get Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 out pretty soon and gve it a couple of
weeks
> to get tested. Something like a Beta by 24th and two week's beta period.
+0 for the schedule (only because I will not be able to
actively help to make the release).
>
> Are there are any remaining showstopper bugs in Ant 1.5.2?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> If any committers would be keen to be the release manager, please speak up
:-)
I will pass the buck this time around.
> Conor
Cheers,
Magesh
************************************************
* "Progress might have been all right once, *
* but it has gone on too long." -- Ogden Nash *
************************************************
Re: Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?
Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 01:31 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Maybe <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17634>. I'm
> not sure, but this looks like a regression (Ant 1.5.1 would happily
> accept manifests in any encoding).
Yes, but the resulting manifests were likely invalid and could possibly cause
something using UTF-8 to read the manifest to choke.
>
> I'm not sure whether it is possible, but maybe it would be better to
> give manifest an encoding attribute and make it default to the
> platform's default encoding (compatible with 1.5.1 and earlier). It
> should always write UTF-8, though.
>
Yes, probably a good idea. I'll try to look at it in the next few days.
--
Conor MacNeill
Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/
Re: Ant 1.5.3 Release Plan?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
wrote:
> I'd like to get Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 out pretty soon
+1
> and gve it a couple of weeks to get tested. Something like a Beta by
> 24th and two week's beta period.
Fine with me.
> Are there are any remaining showstopper bugs in Ant 1.5.2?
Maybe <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17634>. I'm
not sure, but this looks like a regression (Ant 1.5.1 would happily
accept manifests in any encoding).
I'm not sure whether it is possible, but maybe it would be better to
give manifest an encoding attribute and make it default to the
platform's default encoding (compatible with 1.5.1 and earlier). It
should always write UTF-8, though.
> If any committers would be keen to be the release manager, please
> speak up :-)
Not keen, but willing (and willing to pass the ball to somebody else,
for sure 8-).
Stefan