[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3443) Port 3.x FieldCache.getDocsWithField() to trunk

["Michael McCandless (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3443.
----------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    
> Port 3.x FieldCache.getDocsWithField() to trunk
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3443
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 3.5, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3443.patch, LUCENE-3443.patch, LUCENE-3443.patch
>
>
> [Spinoff from LUCENE-3390]
> I think the approach in 3.x for handling un-valued docs, and making it
> possible to specify how such docs are sorted, is better than the
> solution we have in trunk.
> I like that FC has a dedicated method to get the Bits for docs with field
> -- easy for apps to directly use.  And I like that the
> bits have their own entry in the FC.
> One downside is that it's 2 passes to get values and valid bits, but
> I think we can fix this by passing optional bool to FC.getXXX methods
> indicating you want the bits, and the populate the FC entry for the
> missing bits as well.  (We can do that for 3.x and trunk). Then it's
> single pass.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org