You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomee.apache.org by "Jonathan S. Fisher" <jo...@springventuregroup.com> on 2015/10/27 17:21:56 UTC
Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current transaction,
why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
transaction?
Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
-Jonathan
--
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
any computer.
Re: Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
A MDB as well ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-10-28 16:33 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> Yep, we can't wait till 7.x is released! We're hoping this year?? :D :D
>
> Actually, I just had another thought. A Stateless EJB is pretty much the
> same thing as @TransactionScoped, is it not?
>
> @Stateless
> @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRED)
> public class JmsContext {
> }
>
>
>
>
> *Jonathan S. Fisher*
> *VP - Information Technology*
> *Spring Venture Group*
> (o) 913-653-8820
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > note sure if it was only for releases or more generally so saying it
> > anyway: it is in 7.x
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-10-27 18:25 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> > jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> >
> > > I suppose we could implement it that way... Have a @Produces
> > > @TransactionScoped on an JMS Session object. hmm.
> > >
> > > Too bad no @TransactionScoped in TomEE at the moment :(
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > >
> > > > if I followed you just want @TransactionScoped?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2015-10-27 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> > > > jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current
> > > > transaction,
> > > > > why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
> > > > > transaction?
> > > > >
> > > > > Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jonathan
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > > > > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> > > > subject
> > > > > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance
> > Portability
> > > > and
> > > > > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole
> use
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> > > intended
> > > > > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying
> of
> > > the
> > > > > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or
> > civil
> > > > > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please
> contact
> > > the
> > > > > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the
> material
> > > from
> > > > > any computer.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> > subject
> > > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability
> > and
> > > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of
> > the
> > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended
> > > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of
> the
> > > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> > > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact
> the
> > > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material
> from
> > > any computer.
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
> to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
> Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
> message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
> sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
> any computer.
>
Re: Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
Posted by "Jonathan S. Fisher" <jo...@springventuregroup.com>.
Yep, we can't wait till 7.x is released! We're hoping this year?? :D :D
Actually, I just had another thought. A Stateless EJB is pretty much the
same thing as @TransactionScoped, is it not?
@Stateless
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRED)
public class JmsContext {
}
*Jonathan S. Fisher*
*VP - Information Technology*
*Spring Venture Group*
(o) 913-653-8820
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> note sure if it was only for releases or more generally so saying it
> anyway: it is in 7.x
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-10-27 18:25 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
>
> > I suppose we could implement it that way... Have a @Produces
> > @TransactionScoped on an JMS Session object. hmm.
> >
> > Too bad no @TransactionScoped in TomEE at the moment :(
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > if I followed you just want @TransactionScoped?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >
> > > 2015-10-27 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> > > jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> > >
> > > > We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current
> > > transaction,
> > > > why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
> > > > transaction?
> > > >
> > > > Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
> > > >
> > > > -Jonathan
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > > > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> > > subject
> > > > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance
> Portability
> > > and
> > > > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use
> of
> > > the
> > > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> > intended
> > > > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of
> > the
> > > > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or
> civil
> > > > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact
> > the
> > > > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material
> > from
> > > > any computer.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> subject
> > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability
> and
> > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of
> the
> > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
> > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
> > any computer.
> >
>
--
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
any computer.
Re: Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
note sure if it was only for releases or more generally so saying it
anyway: it is in 7.x
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-10-27 18:25 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> I suppose we could implement it that way... Have a @Produces
> @TransactionScoped on an JMS Session object. hmm.
>
> Too bad no @TransactionScoped in TomEE at the moment :(
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > if I followed you just want @TransactionScoped?
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-10-27 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> > jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> >
> > > We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current
> > transaction,
> > > why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
> > > transaction?
> > >
> > > Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
> > >
> > > -Jonathan
> > >
> > > --
> > > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> > subject
> > > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability
> > and
> > > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of
> > the
> > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended
> > > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of
> the
> > > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> > > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact
> the
> > > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material
> from
> > > any computer.
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
> to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
> Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
> message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
> sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
> any computer.
>
Re: Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
Posted by "Jonathan S. Fisher" <jo...@springventuregroup.com>.
I suppose we could implement it that way... Have a @Produces
@TransactionScoped on an JMS Session object. hmm.
Too bad no @TransactionScoped in TomEE at the moment :(
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> if I followed you just want @TransactionScoped?
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-10-27 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
> jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
>
> > We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current
> transaction,
> > why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
> > transaction?
> >
> > Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
> >
> > -Jonathan
> >
> > --
> > Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> > transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be
> subject
> > to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability
> and
> > Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of
> the
> > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
> > message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> > penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
> > any computer.
> >
>
--
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
any computer.
Re: Why doesn't Java EE have a @MessagingContext sorta like @PersistenceContext?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jonathan,
if I followed you just want @TransactionScoped?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-10-27 17:21 GMT+01:00 Jonathan S. Fisher <
jonathan@springventuregroup.com>:
> We have container managed EntityManagers bound to the current transaction,
> why not container managed messaging context bound to the current
> transaction?
>
> Has the JEE expert group ever discussed this? Just curious.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> --
> Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject
> to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
> Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the
> message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil
> penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the
> sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from
> any computer.
>