XmlJavaTypeAdapter versus ASM

[Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>]

I just set up a phalanx of XmlJavaTypeAdapter annotations at package
level to allow me to use JAXB for a bunch of types that lack public
ctors and such.

So far, it doesn't work.

I note in the doc for the JAXB annotation that it applies to 'all
references in the package' to the classes called out in the
annotation.

So, the ASM process, for this wrapped service, produces classes like:

com.basistech.rnt.assistant.ws.jaxws_asm.Initialize

This suggests to me that I have to add a package-info.java for that
package name with the _asm on the end.

Does this make sense? I'll try it tomorrow in any case.