[RESULT] [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

[Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>]

The following binding votes were cast in favor (+1):

Craig Russell
Bertrand Delacretaz
Martijn Dashorst
Robert Burrell Donkin
Matt Hogstrom
Jean T. Anderson
Davanum Srinivas

The following non-binding vote was cast in favor (+1):
Luciano Resende

No other votes were cast.

The vote passes. The policy will be updated.

Craig

On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that  
> there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which  
> currently confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The  
> patch simply removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are  
> binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml	(revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml	(working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
> the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At  
> least
> three +1 votes are required (see the
> <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting  
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then  
> the Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send a
> summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!