You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2005/07/10 07:22:41 UTC
[Bug 4394] Bounce detection within Spamassassin default rulset
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4394
Bob@Menschel.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From Bob@Menschel.net 2005-07-09 22:22 -------
Section 3 -- Frequencies Log
(First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
296500 135240 161260 0.456 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
13959 8647 5312 0.660 0.00 1.00 NULL_SENDER
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
296500 135240 161260 0.456 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 45.6121 54.3879 0.456 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
4.708 6.3938 3.2941 0.660 0.00 1.00 NULL_SENDER
With an S/O of only 0.660, hitting well over 5k ham in my corpus, this set of
rules needs a LOT of work before it can be incorporated into the distribution
rules sets. Closing as WONTFIX for now. If/when you have other variations worth
testing, send them my way, and I'll work with you to get stats you can use to
improve your rules.
If/when there's a set that has a high enough S/O and high enough spam hit ratio,
then we can open a new bug entry for that submission.
Meanwhile, I find that Tim Jackson's rules file at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bogus-virus-warnings.cf works well here.
Perhaps the two of you can work together on this project?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.