You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Conor MacNeill <co...@cognet.com.au> on 2001/01/02 15:51:09 UTC

Re: [Xalan2J] Using new Xalan2-TRaX interfaces for XalanLiaison.java

Davanum,

The new interfaces you are using here are part of JAXP 1.1, is that
correct? I think this is still early access, so I'm not sure whether we
should jump up to these just yet. Also, whilst these classes are in the
xalan source tree, they did not seem to get put into a jar. They are in the
jaxp.jar that comes with jaxp1.1 EA2, but I was just wondering whether the
xalan project will also produce them in a jar.

I haven't got strong opinions here either way so if any style task users do
have an opinion, I'd like to here it now.

I have also just committed a change by Jeff Martin that changes the
XSLTLiaison interface. You'll need to add that in too, if this is to go
ahead.

Conor


----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <di...@yahoo.com>
To: <an...@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: "Peter Donald" <do...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 12:19 AM
Subject: Fwd: [Xalan2J] Using new Xalan2-TRaX interfaces for
XalanLiaison.java


> Reposting....As it was ignored before :(
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
> http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org



Re: [Xalan2J] Using new Xalan2-TRaX interfaces for XalanLiaison.java

Posted by James Duncan Davidson <du...@x180.net>.
On 1/2/01 6:51 AM, "Conor MacNeill" <co...@cognet.com.au> wrote:

> The new interfaces you are using here are part of JAXP 1.1, is that
> correct? I think this is still early access, so I'm not sure whether we
> should jump up to these just yet.

JAXP 1.1 is pretty stable at this point. I wouldn't expect big changes from
here on out. What changes are possible should be minor fix ups.


-- 
James Duncan Davidson                                        duncan@x180.net
                                                                  !try; do()