You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Jasper Wang <yu...@gmail.com> on 2018/06/01 14:39:32 UTC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing 2.5.0 release next week

Hi JB and team,

Very excited to hear that the release process of python SDK 2.5 has
started. Can’t wait to use it for streaming on Dataflow.

Just a silly question though - how long the release process typically takes?

Thx in advance.

Jasper

On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 11:14 pm, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Yes I confirm: I already checked that last week. Thanks for the double
> check !
>
> Regards
> JB
> Le 31 mai 2018, à 15:13, Etienne Chauchot <ec...@apache.org> a écrit:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I did some tests on the maven artifacts produced by the gradle build:
>>
>> I published maven artifacts to local maven repo using :
>>
>>  ./gradlew publishToMavenLocal -PisRelease --no-parallel -x test
>>
>> then used beam samples project (maven based) and did a
>>
>> mvn dependency:tree
>>
>> => transitive dependencies of all beam related artifacts are well resolved
>>
>> Le jeudi 31 mai 2018 à 14:43 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
>>
>> Agree, I gonna start the release process tonight (my time).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> Le 31 mai 2018, à 14:29, Kenneth Knowles < klk@google.com> a écrit:
>>
>> Yea - the branch should be cut before trying to finish the burndown.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:09 AM Robert Bradshaw < robertwb@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I think it makes sense to cut the release and get the ball rolling, and
>> iff the  ParquetIO/S3 issue turns out to be simple, we cherry-pick,
>> otherwise we add a note.
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < jb@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Regarding RabbitMqIO, Eugene provided new feedback last night that I
>> would like to implement. However, it's not a release blocker, so I will
>> move forward with 2.5.0 release without RabbitMqIO  (I will include in
>> 2.6.0).
>>
>> Regarding ParquetIO, I tested HDFS successfully as well (I had an issue
>> on my namenode). S3 is important, but I think we can just add a note in
>> the RELEASE NOTE  and move forward with 2.5.0. Thoughts ?
>>
>> So, please, let me know if I can start the release process today (I
>> would like to  move forward asap).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>