You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apisix.apache.org by Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> on 2021/12/20 13:12:04 UTC
[Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
dropping the support of Tengine.
Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
Tengine:
1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
released years ago.
2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
work with Tengine.
3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
apisix-base.
4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
by Tengine.
By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
support OpenResty 1.19+.
What about your opinion?
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by ZhengSong Tu <tz...@gmail.com>.
agreed, I've found very little feedback on Tengine in the communit, it
seems that people don't really need it.
*ZhengSong Tu*
My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass
Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:25写道：
>
> Hi, Zexuan.
> I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
> us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
> to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
>
> Best regards!
> Zeping Bai @bzp2010
>
>
>
> Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
>
> > As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > dropping the support of Tengine.
> >
> > Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
> > Tengine:
> > 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > released years ago.
> > 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> > is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > work with Tengine.
> > 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
> > apisix-base.
> > 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
> > by Tengine.
> >
> > By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > support OpenResty 1.19+.
> >
> > What about your opinion?
> >
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by JunXu Chen <ch...@apache.org>.
agree +1
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 15:50, JinChao Shuai <sh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> agree +1
>
> YuanSheng Wang <me...@apache.org> 于2021年12月22日周三 23:10写道：
>
> > agree +1
> >
> > the Tengine is not active recently.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Bozhong Yu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine
> > >
> > > Zhiyuan Ju <ju...@apache.org> 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道：
> > >
> > > > > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > > > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
> > > >
> > > > Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support
> > > of
> > > > Tengine.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards!
> > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Agreed.
> > > > > One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Leslie Tsang
> > > > > leslie.tsang@icloud.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, Zexuan.
> > > > > > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it
> > > does
> > > > > > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also,
> > > according
> > > > > > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > > > > > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards!
> > > > > > Zeping Bai @bzp2010
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > > > > >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > > > > >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the
> > support
> > > of
> > > > > >> Tengine:
> > > > > >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > > > > >> released years ago.
> > > > > >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor
> > who
> > > > > >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > > > > >> work with Tengine.
> > > > > >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported
> > > in
> > > > > >> apisix-base.
> > > > > >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not
> > > supported
> > > > > >> by Tengine.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > > > > >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > > > > >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> What about your opinion?
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *MembPhis*
> > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Janko
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by JinChao Shuai <sh...@apache.org>.
agree +1
YuanSheng Wang <me...@apache.org> 于2021年12月22日周三 23:10写道：
> agree +1
>
> the Tengine is not active recently.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Bozhong Yu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine
> >
> > Zhiyuan Ju <ju...@apache.org> 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道：
> >
> > > > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
> > >
> > > Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support
> > of
> > > Tengine.
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > >
> > >
> > > Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道：
> > >
> > > > Agreed.
> > > > One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Leslie Tsang
> > > > leslie.tsang@icloud.com
> > > >
> > > > > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, Zexuan.
> > > > > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it
> > does
> > > > > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also,
> > according
> > > > > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > > > > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards!
> > > > > Zeping Bai @bzp2010
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> > > > >
> > > > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > > > >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > > > >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the
> support
> > of
> > > > >> Tengine:
> > > > >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > > > >> released years ago.
> > > > >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor
> who
> > > > >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > > > >> work with Tengine.
> > > > >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported
> > in
> > > > >> apisix-base.
> > > > >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not
> > supported
> > > > >> by Tengine.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > > > >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > > > >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What about your opinion?
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> *MembPhis*
> My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
>
--
Thanks,
Janko
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by YuanSheng Wang <me...@apache.org>.
agree +1
the Tengine is not active recently.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Bozhong Yu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine
>
> Zhiyuan Ju <ju...@apache.org> 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道：
>
> > > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
> >
> > Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support
> of
> > Tengine.
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> >
> >
> > Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道：
> >
> > > Agreed.
> > > One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
> > >
> > >
> > > Leslie Tsang
> > > leslie.tsang@icloud.com
> > >
> > > > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Zexuan.
> > > > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it
> does
> > > > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also,
> according
> > > > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > > > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards!
> > > > Zeping Bai @bzp2010
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> > > >
> > > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > > >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> > > >>
> > > >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > > >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support
> of
> > > >> Tengine:
> > > >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > > >> released years ago.
> > > >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> > > >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > > >> work with Tengine.
> > > >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported
> in
> > > >> apisix-base.
> > > >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not
> supported
> > > >> by Tengine.
> > > >>
> > > >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > > >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > > >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > > >>
> > > >> What about your opinion?
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
*MembPhis*
My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by Bozhong Yu <im...@gmail.com>.
Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine
Zhiyuan Ju <ju...@apache.org> 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道：
> > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
>
> Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support of
> Tengine.
>
> Best Regards!
> @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
>
>
> Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道：
>
> > Agreed.
> > One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
> >
> >
> > Leslie Tsang
> > leslie.tsang@icloud.com
> >
> > > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Zexuan.
> > > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
> > > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
> > > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> > >
> > > Best regards!
> > > Zeping Bai @bzp2010
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> > >
> > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> > >>
> > >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
> > >> Tengine:
> > >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > >> released years ago.
> > >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> > >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > >> work with Tengine.
> > >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
> > >> apisix-base.
> > >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
> > >> by Tengine.
> > >>
> > >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > >>
> > >> What about your opinion?
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by Zhiyuan Ju <ju...@apache.org>.
> In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support of
Tengine.
Best Regards!
@ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道：
> Agreed.
> One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
>
>
> Leslie Tsang
> leslie.tsang@icloud.com
>
> > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Zexuan.
> > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
> > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
> > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> >
> > Best regards!
> > Zeping Bai @bzp2010
> >
> >
> >
> > Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> >
> >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> >>
> >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
> >> Tengine:
> >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> >> released years ago.
> >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> >> work with Tengine.
> >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
> >> apisix-base.
> >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
> >> by Tengine.
> >>
> >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> >>
> >> What about your opinion?
> >>
>
>
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by Tsangleslie <le...@icloud.com.INVALID>.
Agreed.
One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
Leslie Tsang
leslie.tsang@icloud.com
> On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Zexuan.
> I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
> us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
> to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
>
> Best regards!
> Zeping Bai @bzp2010
>
>
>
> Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
>
>> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
>> dropping the support of Tengine.
>>
>> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
>> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
>> Tengine:
>> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
>> released years ago.
>> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
>> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
>> work with Tengine.
>> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
>> apisix-base.
>> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
>> by Tengine.
>>
>> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
>> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
>> support OpenResty 1.19+.
>>
>> What about your opinion?
>>
Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine
Posted by Zeping Bai <bz...@apache.org>.
Hi, Zexuan.
I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
Best regards!
Zeping Bai @bzp2010
Zexuan Luo <sp...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道：
> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> dropping the support of Tengine.
>
> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
> Tengine:
> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> released years ago.
> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> work with Tengine.
> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
> apisix-base.
> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
> by Tengine.
>
> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> support OpenResty 1.19+.
>
> What about your opinion?
>