You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com> on 2018/12/18 07:57:10 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]
Hi,
Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
1. Near the end of the file it has:
platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
Apache-2.0
If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list, correct?
2. At the end of the file it contains:
"Notes
-----
[ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
Contributors:
Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October 1,
2009)
Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317
[ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Contributors:
Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
4, 2013)
Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=338
[ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
Contributors:
dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
"
Is this correct for the Licence file?
Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
vote.
Regards
John
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5]
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Perfect and makes sense to me.
Thanks,
Gj
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just about this vote thread. This will be open for at least 72+ hours I'm
> going to close it 20st of December in the evening PST.
>
> After that I'm going to start another thread on
> general@incubator.apache.org carrying over the votes and binding votes of
> our IPMC members, that thread shall be open for at least 72 hours. And
> will remain open till we get at least 3 +1 votes (hopefully no -1-s). This
> would mean we could expect Apache NetBeans (incubating) 10.0 around
> Christmas Eve, the earliest. As usually this time is one of the busiest in
> the year with family errands. I'd expect some delays.
>
> Please, correct me if I'm wrong in any way with this!
>
> On 12/17/18 11:57 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>>
>> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
>> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
>> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/Smo
>> othScrollPaneUI.java
>> Apache-2.0
>> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
>> correct?
>>
>> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
>> "Notes
>> -----
>> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October
>> 1,
>> 2009)
>> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?i
>> d=317
>>
>> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
>> 4, 2013)
>> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?i
>> d=338
>>
>> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>>
>> "
>>
>> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>>
>> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
>> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
>> vote.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5]
Posted by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>.
Just about this vote thread. This will be open for at least 72+ hours
I'm going to close it 20st of December in the evening PST.
After that I'm going to start another thread on
general@incubator.apache.org carrying over the votes and binding votes
of our IPMC members, that thread shall be open for at least 72 hours.
And will remain open till we get at least 3 +1 votes (hopefully no
-1-s). This would mean we could expect Apache NetBeans (incubating) 10.0
around Christmas Eve, the earliest. As usually this time is one of the
busiest in the year with family errands. I'd expect some delays.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong in any way with this!
On 12/17/18 11:57 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>
> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
> Apache-2.0
> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list, correct?
>
> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
> "Notes
> -----
> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October 1,
> 2009)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317
>
> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
> 4, 2013)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=338
>
> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>
> "
>
> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>
> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
> vote.
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5] SHA1 Hash mismatch
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 16:26, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
Do we really need that in future? Just caused me a double-take too!
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5] SHA1 Hash mismatch
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
> The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
That SHA1 confused me too.
The SHA512 for the release artefact seems quite essential. Somebody
changing the artefact can easily update the hash too, but if the hash
is publicly listed in the email then it's almost impossible to change
the artefact so that the hash remains the same...
--emi
http://coolbeans.xyz/ - CoolBeans: An IDE for Java, JavaEE, PHP and more!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 6:26 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Tushar,
>
> The release does not come with SHA1 checksums. We are using SHA512 only
> and the checksum files are next to their corresponding zip files.
>
> The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
>
>
> On 12/17/18 11:57 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
> >
> > When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
> > 1. Near the end of the file it has:
> > platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
> > Apache-2.0
> > If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list, correct?
> >
> > 2. At the end of the file it contains:
> > "Notes
> > -----
> > [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
> >
> > Contributors:
> > Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October 1,
> > 2009)
> > Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317
> >
> > [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
> >
> > Contributors:
> > Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
> > 4, 2013)
> > Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=338
> >
> > [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
> >
> > Contributors:
> > dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
> >
> > "
> >
> > Is this correct for the Licence file?
> >
> > Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
> > the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
> > vote.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > John
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5] SHA1 Hash mismatch
Posted by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>.
Dear Tushar,
The release does not come with SHA1 checksums. We are using SHA512 only
and the checksum files are next to their corresponding zip files.
The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
On 12/17/18 11:57 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>
> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
> Apache-2.0
> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list, correct?
>
> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
> "Notes
> -----
> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October 1,
> 2009)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317
>
> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
> 4, 2013)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=338
>
> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>
> "
>
> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>
> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
> vote.
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5]
Posted by John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>.
@Matthias as requested, I have opened NETBEANS-1803[1], I agree its not
blocking the release, so will vote now.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1803
John
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 17:26, John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Cool,
>
> I'll try to raise an idea when I get home tonight but other than that I
> didnt see any other issues with the release... so I'll vote tonight after I
> create the issues...
>
> John
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 13:12, Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu>
> wrote:
>
>> The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow
>> night).
>>
>> Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation
>> (adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for
>> the notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license generation. An
>> issue would be good to track that. Feel free to assign it to me, from my
>> POV this should not block release though.
>>
>> Point 2: the entries are foot notes for the table directly above them.
>>
>> Am 18. Dezember 2018 11:51:47 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga
>> <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:
>> >Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
>> >
>> >For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
>> >minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else
>> >is
>> >in a good state.
>> >
>> >Gj
>> >
>> >On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell
>> ><mc...@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>> >>
>> >> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
>> >> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
>> >> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/
>> >> SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
>> >> Apache-2.0
>> >> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
>> >> correct?
>> >>
>> >> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
>> >> "Notes
>> >> -----
>> >> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>> >>
>> >> Contributors:
>> >> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0
>> >(October 1,
>> >> 2009)
>> >> Specification available from
>> >http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> >> id=317
>> >>
>> >> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights
>> >reserved.
>> >>
>> >> Contributors:
>> >> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1
>> >(February
>> >> 4, 2013)
>> >> Specification available from
>> >http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> >> id=338
>> >>
>> >> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>> >>
>> >> Contributors:
>> >> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>> >>
>> >> "
>> >>
>> >> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>> >>
>> >> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and
>> >build
>> >> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing
>> >to
>> >> vote.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>> gesendet.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5]
Posted by John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>.
Cool,
I'll try to raise an idea when I get home tonight but other than that I
didnt see any other issues with the release... so I'll vote tonight after I
create the issues...
John
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 13:12, Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu>
wrote:
> The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow
> night).
>
> Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation
> (adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for
> the notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license generation. An
> issue would be good to track that. Feel free to assign it to me, from my
> POV this should not block release though.
>
> Point 2: the entries are foot notes for the table directly above them.
>
> Am 18. Dezember 2018 11:51:47 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:
> >Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
> >
> >For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
> >minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else
> >is
> >in a good state.
> >
> >Gj
> >
> >On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell
> ><mc...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
> >>
> >> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
> >> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
> >> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/
> >> SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
> >> Apache-2.0
> >> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
> >> correct?
> >>
> >> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
> >> "Notes
> >> -----
> >> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
> >>
> >> Contributors:
> >> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0
> >(October 1,
> >> 2009)
> >> Specification available from
> >http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
> >> id=317
> >>
> >> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights
> >reserved.
> >>
> >> Contributors:
> >> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1
> >(February
> >> 4, 2013)
> >> Specification available from
> >http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
> >> id=338
> >>
> >> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
> >>
> >> Contributors:
> >> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
> >>
> >> "
> >>
> >> Is this correct for the Licence file?
> >>
> >> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and
> >build
> >> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing
> >to
> >> vote.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> John
> >>
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]
Posted by Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu>.
The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow night).
Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation (adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for the notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license generation. An issue would be good to track that. Feel free to assign it to me, from my POV this should not block release though.
Point 2: the entries are foot notes for the table directly above them.
Am 18. Dezember 2018 11:51:47 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:
>Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
>
>For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
>minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else
>is
>in a good state.
>
>Gj
>
>On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell
><mc...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>>
>> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
>> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
>> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/
>> SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
>> Apache-2.0
>> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
>> correct?
>>
>> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
>> "Notes
>> -----
>> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0
>(October 1,
>> 2009)
>> Specification available from
>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> id=317
>>
>> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights
>reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1
>(February
>> 4, 2013)
>> Specification available from
>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> id=338
>>
>> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>>
>> "
>>
>> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>>
>> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and
>build
>> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing
>to
>> vote.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote
candidate 5]
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else is
in a good state.
Gj
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>
> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/
> SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
> Apache-2.0
> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
> correct?
>
> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
> "Notes
> -----
> [ 1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0 (October 1,
> 2009)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
> id=317
>
> [ 2] Copyright (c) 2008 - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1 (February
> 4, 2013)
> Specification available from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
> id=338
>
> [ 3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>
> Contributors:
> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>
> "
>
> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>
> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and build
> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing to
> vote.
>
> Regards
>
> John
>