Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

[Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>]

+1 for 1.7
imo there is no need to stick with 1.6.x

regards,
gerhard



2016-01-31 16:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:

> +1 for 1.7
> but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users.
>
> 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> > +1 for what? staying with 1.6.x or moving to 1.7.x?
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 31.01.2016 um 13:06 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > 2016-01-31 12:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> > >
> > >> hi folks!
> > >>
> > >> While implementing OWB-1107 I had to introduce a subinterface of
> > >> ScannerService called ‚BdaScannerService‘
> > >> While OWB deployer works find with both old ScannerService and new
> > >> BdaScannerService SPI impls it might probably be better to indicate
> the
> > new
> > >> SPI by moving the minor number?
> > >>
> > >> I personally can live with keeping 1.6.3 as next version. But I am
> also
> > >> fine with 1.7.x as we really introduced a few new things which are up
> > for
> > >> CDI-2.0 officially.
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> >
> >
>