Stanbol development

[Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>]

So, just wondering... of the folks who have worked on Stanbol up until
now, is there still interest in continuing to work on Stanbol among
that group? That is, is the lull in activity because people aren't
interested / available, or is because Stanbol is simply complete as is
and doesn't *need* any more work?

Are there features that people have in mind for adding to a
(potential) next release?  If so, can anybody call out what some of
the highest priority ones might be?  I'm still interested in possibly
trying to help with some Stanbol activity, depending on what things
are needed / wanted...


Cheers,

Phil
~~~~
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM

Re: Stanbol development

[Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>]

Gotcha. I'll pore over the backlog soon and see if there's anything I
might be able to take on, or at least help with.


Phil

This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM


On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> I think it is just a matter of lack of time. There are still some good
> ideas/refactors in the backlog (some of them discussed not too much time
> ago), but we probably failed to build a broader community.
>
> My time is quite limited and others like Rupert has expressed the same
> recently, but I'm still wiling and looking forward to put some effort in
> the project.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So, just wondering... of the folks who have worked on Stanbol up until
>> now, is there still interest in continuing to work on Stanbol among
>> that group? That is, is the lull in activity because people aren't
>> interested / available, or is because Stanbol is simply complete as is
>> and doesn't *need* any more work?
>>
>> Are there features that people have in mind for adding to a
>> (potential) next release?  If so, can anybody call out what some of
>> the highest priority ones might be?  I'm still interested in possibly
>> trying to help with some Stanbol activity, depending on what things
>> are needed / wanted...
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Phil
>> ~~~~
>> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
>>

Re: Stanbol development

[Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>]

Hi Philip,

I think it is just a matter of lack of time. There are still some good
ideas/refactors in the backlog (some of them discussed not too much time
ago), but we probably failed to build a broader community.

My time is quite limited and others like Rupert has expressed the same
recently, but I'm still wiling and looking forward to put some effort in
the project.

Cheers,
Rafa

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> So, just wondering... of the folks who have worked on Stanbol up until
> now, is there still interest in continuing to work on Stanbol among
> that group? That is, is the lull in activity because people aren't
> interested / available, or is because Stanbol is simply complete as is
> and doesn't *need* any more work?
>
> Are there features that people have in mind for adding to a
> (potential) next release?  If so, can anybody call out what some of
> the highest priority ones might be?  I'm still interested in possibly
> trying to help with some Stanbol activity, depending on what things
> are needed / wanted...
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
> ~~~~
> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
>