You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Violeta Georgieva <vi...@apache.org> on 2013/11/16 12:23:39 UTC
Time for 7.0.48
Hi,
I'm planning to prepare 7.0.48 for voting.
Please reply here if you would like to include something in that release.
Regards
Violeta
Re: Time for 7.0.48
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
Given the regression in startup speed due to the web socket scanning, it
would be /really/ nice if this release included clear notes on how one
can best disable this.
On 12/9/2013 4:41 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/11/16 Violeta Georgieva <vi...@apache.org>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning to prepare 7.0.48 for voting.
>>
>> Please reply here if you would like to include something in that release.
>
> I'll tag 7.0.48 in the afternoon.
>
>
>> Regards
>> Violeta
Re: Time for 7.0.48
Posted by Violeta Georgieva <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2013/11/16 Violeta Georgieva <vi...@apache.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to prepare 7.0.48 for voting.
>
> Please reply here if you would like to include something in that release.
I'll tag 7.0.48 in the afternoon.
> Regards
> Violeta
Re: Time for 7.0.48
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 16/11/2013 11:23, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to prepare 7.0.48 for voting.
>
> Please reply here if you would like to include something in that release.
I'd like a little time to look at the WebSocket issue (BZ 55799)
reported yesterday.
BZ 55759 is an obvious candidate for 7.0.48.
I've a few other bits and pieces I'd like to get in as well.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org