You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airavata.apache.org by "ptangcha@umail.iu.edu" <pt...@umail.iu.edu> on 2011/09/03 19:23:06 UTC
Logging library
Hello devs,
After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I think we
should unify our logging library in the project.
Right now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j, and slf4j in both
build files (pom.xml) and source codes.
Personally,
I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained and it also compatible
with others (just drop a jar file to a classpath).
--
Best Regards,
Patanachai Tangchaisin
Re: Logging library
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
+! for sl4j as well.
Unless we see any negative votes, I suggest we put JIRA tickets for all components to change to a single logger and cleanup any logging and sysouts.
Suresh
On Sep 3, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi wrote:
> Since the slf4j license [1] is also compatible with Apache license, here's
> my +1.
>
> [1] - http://www.slf4j.org/license.html
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm also +1 for slf4j.
>>
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/11 1:46 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
>>> Hi Patnachai,
>>>
>>> I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of
>>> using log4j with commons-logging wrapper.
>>>
>>>
>>> There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove
>>> them too !
>>>
>>> Lahiru
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
>>> <ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello devs,
>>>>
>>>> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I
>>>> think we should unify our logging library in the project. Right
>>>> now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j,
>>>
>>> and slf4j in both
>>>> build files (pom.xml) and source codes.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained
>>>> and it also compatible with others (just drop a jar file to a
>>>> classpath).
>>>>
>>>> -- Best Regards, Patanachai Tangchaisin
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYmhuAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5WigH/jXXRQTczdoflVzKQIMhyHL9
>> ZiJaGJ0ijFCJdCisAol/eTLE8hwgFgmTxdKlG5ca1QX8skIOWKSHK7Ik76iM4/9D
>> uA5yQmEZpc8t6opSMdiC2SlkUXa6NAcJWKHX7SLDll8cY9pHiXX26D1QbC7MFFtm
>> I4HBeVqMGHWKM+sSuID3MVmHJ1IPjwRw0JoI6HBwYX3EBsWBeh+DkjZdRPklVtAT
>> kp1fAGJ6RcwlQeb9bS3hclcHayn7UnUOljvZ2iNUOLv4Wk7foFfDzTdxbo9nOIyG
>> GfMsmzBzeEMlOL2R9aXzxCshY5szvYPzxg5ABOy+h/fav6QD3YhWCjSwv23WrRQ=
>> =QRLd
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
Re: Logging library
Posted by Heshan Suriyaarachchi <he...@gmail.com>.
Since the slf4j license [1] is also compatible with Apache license, here's
my +1.
[1] - http://www.slf4j.org/license.html
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm also +1 for slf4j.
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 9/3/11 1:46 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
> > Hi Patnachai,
> >
> > I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of
> > using log4j with commons-logging wrapper.
> >
> >
> > There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove
> > them too !
> >
> > Lahiru
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
> > <ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello devs,
> >>
> >> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I
> >> think we should unify our logging library in the project. Right
> >> now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j,
> >
> > and slf4j in both
> >> build files (pom.xml) and source codes.
> >>
> >> Personally, I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained
> >> and it also compatible with others (just drop a jar file to a
> >> classpath).
> >>
> >> -- Best Regards, Patanachai Tangchaisin
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYmhuAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5WigH/jXXRQTczdoflVzKQIMhyHL9
> ZiJaGJ0ijFCJdCisAol/eTLE8hwgFgmTxdKlG5ca1QX8skIOWKSHK7Ik76iM4/9D
> uA5yQmEZpc8t6opSMdiC2SlkUXa6NAcJWKHX7SLDll8cY9pHiXX26D1QbC7MFFtm
> I4HBeVqMGHWKM+sSuID3MVmHJ1IPjwRw0JoI6HBwYX3EBsWBeh+DkjZdRPklVtAT
> kp1fAGJ6RcwlQeb9bS3hclcHayn7UnUOljvZ2iNUOLv4Wk7foFfDzTdxbo9nOIyG
> GfMsmzBzeEMlOL2R9aXzxCshY5szvYPzxg5ABOy+h/fav6QD3YhWCjSwv23WrRQ=
> =QRLd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Regards,
Heshan Suriyaarachchi
http://heshans.blogspot.com/
Re: Logging library
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm also +1 for slf4j.
Marlon
On 9/3/11 1:46 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
> Hi Patnachai,
>
> I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of
> using log4j with commons-logging wrapper.
>
>
> There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove
> them too !
>
> Lahiru
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
> <ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
>> wrote:
>
>> Hello devs,
>>
>> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I
>> think we should unify our logging library in the project. Right
>> now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j,
>
> and slf4j in both
>> build files (pom.xml) and source codes.
>>
>> Personally, I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained
>> and it also compatible with others (just drop a jar file to a
>> classpath).
>>
>> -- Best Regards, Patanachai Tangchaisin
>>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYmhuAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5WigH/jXXRQTczdoflVzKQIMhyHL9
ZiJaGJ0ijFCJdCisAol/eTLE8hwgFgmTxdKlG5ca1QX8skIOWKSHK7Ik76iM4/9D
uA5yQmEZpc8t6opSMdiC2SlkUXa6NAcJWKHX7SLDll8cY9pHiXX26D1QbC7MFFtm
I4HBeVqMGHWKM+sSuID3MVmHJ1IPjwRw0JoI6HBwYX3EBsWBeh+DkjZdRPklVtAT
kp1fAGJ6RcwlQeb9bS3hclcHayn7UnUOljvZ2iNUOLv4Wk7foFfDzTdxbo9nOIyG
GfMsmzBzeEMlOL2R9aXzxCshY5szvYPzxg5ABOy+h/fav6QD3YhWCjSwv23WrRQ=
=QRLd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Logging library
Posted by Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Patnachai,
I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of using log4j
with commons-logging wrapper.
There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove them too
!
Lahiru
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, ptangcha@umail.iu.edu <ptangcha@umail.iu.edu
> wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I think we
> should unify our logging library in the project.
> Right now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j,
and slf4j in both
> build files (pom.xml) and source codes.
>
> Personally,
> I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained and it also
> compatible
> with others (just drop a jar file to a classpath).
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Patanachai Tangchaisin
>
--
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University