You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2009/03/14 17:32:36 UTC
ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1
release candidate 1)
I've posted a new release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes Wednesday,
the 18th of March.
Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
Thanks,
St.Ack
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to sink the
> release.
>
> Going back over commit logs,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
> applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the RowResult
> implements Comparable failed to apply .
>
> My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
> candidate soon.
>
> Thanks Erik,
> St.Ack
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with each other
>> we need RowResult to be comparable.
>> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to write
>> MR
>> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
>> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this issue
>> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
>>
>> Regards Erik
>>
>
>
Re: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1
release candidate 1)
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <
Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> +1 reviewed docs. One minor nit is that the release notes list HBASE-1262
> as included in this release but Jira says this issue is unresolved.
I moved this issue out of 0.19.1 so not counter as part of this release.
Good stuff,
St.Ack
RE: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1
release candidate 1)
Posted by "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" <Ji...@microsoft.com>.
+1 reviewed docs. One minor nit is that the release notes list HBASE-1262
as included in this release but Jira says this issue is unresolved.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> stack
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:33 AM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN: hbase-
> 0.19.1 release candidate 1)
>
> I've posted a new release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Wednesday,
> the 18th of March.
>
> Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to
> sink the
> > release.
> >
> > Going back over commit logs,
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
> > applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the
> RowResult
> > implements Comparable failed to apply .
> >
> > My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
> > candidate soon.
> >
> > Thanks Erik,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad
> <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with each
> other
> >> we need RowResult to be comparable.
> >> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to
> write
> >> MR
> >> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
> >> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this
> issue
> >> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
> >>
> >> Regards Erik
> >>
> >
> >
Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Vote passes. I'll put up the release in a moment.
St.Ack
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Erik Holstad <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
> RowResult is now comparable which we needed for it to work with Cascading.
> +1 on RC2
>
Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
Posted by Erik Holstad <er...@gmail.com>.
RowResult is now comparable which we needed for it to work with Cascading.
+1 on RC2
RE: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
Posted by Jonathan Gray <jl...@streamy.com>.
+1 on RC2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Daniel Cryans
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:50 PM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
> hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
>
> Have been running 0.19.1 candidate 1 since last week in all our envs
> and it works really well. Even tho candidate 2 is a tiny bit
> different, I still +1
>
> J-D
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > I've posted a new release candidate here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
> >
> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Wednesday,
> > the 18th of March.
> >
> > Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to
> sink the
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Going back over commit logs,
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
> >> applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the
> RowResult
> >> implements Comparable failed to apply .
> >>
> >> My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
> >> candidate soon.
> >>
> >> Thanks Erik,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad
> <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with
> each other
> >>> we need RowResult to be comparable.
> >>> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to
> write
> >>> MR
> >>> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
> >>> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this
> issue
> >>> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Regards Erik
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Have been running 0.19.1 candidate 1 since last week in all our envs
and it works really well. Even tho candidate 2 is a tiny bit
different, I still +1
J-D
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted a new release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes Wednesday,
> the 18th of March.
>
> Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to sink the
>> release.
>>
>> Going back over commit logs,
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
>> applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the RowResult
>> implements Comparable failed to apply .
>>
>> My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
>> candidate soon.
>>
>> Thanks Erik,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with each other
>>> we need RowResult to be comparable.
>>> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to write
>>> MR
>>> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
>>> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this issue
>>> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
>>>
>>> Regards Erik
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Have been running 0.19.1 candidate 1 since last week in all our envs
and it works really well. Even tho candidate 2 is a tiny bit
different, I still +1
J-D
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted a new release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes Wednesday,
> the 18th of March.
>
> Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to sink the
>> release.
>>
>> Going back over commit logs,
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
>> applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the RowResult
>> implements Comparable failed to apply .
>>
>> My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
>> candidate soon.
>>
>> Thanks Erik,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with each other
>>> we need RowResult to be comparable.
>>> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to write
>>> MR
>>> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
>>> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this issue
>>> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
>>>
>>> Regards Erik
>>>
>>
>>
>