You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to gitbox@activemq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/05/24 20:04:03 UTC

[GitHub] [activemq-artemis] michaelandrepearce edited a comment on pull request #3124: ARTEMIS-2614 Create queues based on FQQN for AMQP protocol

michaelandrepearce edited a comment on pull request #3124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3124#issuecomment-633289092


   Just to note and for the record, i am cautious of this change, as the FQQN was added for legacy stuff, making this change could be impacting to those expected behaviours. And building on it further encourages its use to proliferate. 
   
   Unlike stomp, which you bring up, AMQP has a very rich messaging structure that supports this, as such its not like comparing stomp or openwire which are limited.
   
   Personally i think for any higher level AMQP clients (e.g JMS/NMS) they would be better to expend time into adding support for the equivalent of jms shared sub in their abstractions, , so in case of NMS that would be to get that updated to  similar spec level with JMS 2.0


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org