Re: Derby + Hibernate - New Year, Fresh Start

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

acemccloudxx@comcast.net wrote:

> The 3.0 Beta 1 has the DerbyDialect in it so I thought that I would
try the Hibernate JUnit tests with the 10.0.2.1 release just to see how
it fared.
>
> 13 failures out of 347 tests.
>
> I also tried the 10.1 snapshot from 1/10 and everything was failing.
>
> It seems like Hibernate support would be a good thing to have, but I
guess it's hard to tell (for a complete newbie like me) whether any
given problem is a Derby problem or a Hibernate problem.

This discussion should be moved to the derby dev list.

Is it possible you could send the failure reports to this list,
especially the ones for 10.1, as I don't think 10.1 has changed much
from 10.0.2.1 and so should continue to work.

Or would it be better to discuss this on a hibernate list, or both?

Dan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB6UVyIv0S4qsbfuQRAuc0AJ0WEwlST6JFTqvjG7hA6YUxfnxTHwCfccI/
DR9aTgPN4BvKgiXKqM+voGo=
=mZog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----