You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2019/03/12 19:52:35 UTC
[VOTE] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Hi,
uimaj-3.0.2 rc1 is posted and ready for voting.
This release corrects a few issues strengthening binary compatibility with UIMA
v2 (meaning code compiled with UIMA v2 can be run using v3 without recompiling
(except for some exceptions, like any user-defined JCas classes).
The issues fixed are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/UIMA/versions/12344592
The source and binary tars/zips are here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uv3/uimaj/3.0.2-rc1/artifacts/
The eclipse update subsite is here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uv3/uimaj/3.0.2-rc1/eclipse-update-site/
The maven staging repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1220/
The SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.2/
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>.
- Build from source - OK
- Spot checked license and notice - OK
- README, RELEASE_NOTES - OK
- JIRA Report - OK
- API Documentation - OK
- Ran Document Analyzer - OK
- Installed UIMA eclipse plugins in the latest eclipse (2018-12) - OK
NOTE: the link to plugins in RC announcement is not correct. Should be:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uv3/uimaj/3.0.2-rc1/eclipse-update-site/uimaj/
- Installed uima-core.jar into the latest UIMA-DUCC and deployed a job - OK
- Spot checked signatures - OK
All my testing was done on Linux.
[x] +1 OK to release
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:42 PM Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> signatures OK
> compare source-release with svn tag : OK
> issues-fixed report: OK
> api-change-reports: OK
> build from sources: OK
> ran document analyzer from bin package, viewed results- OK
> installed plugins into Eclipse 2018-12 OK
> imported example project into Eclipse, it built OK, ran document analyzer:
> OK
> made new type system descriptor, ran JCasGen: OK
> compare licenses with 3.0.0 - no change
> spot check licenses in staging repo: OK
>
> [x] +1 OK to release
>
> - -Marshall Schor
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOn/mVSh3S1eNEDz+zHYv/c0Ez9YFAlyJQPIACgkQzHYv/c0E
> z9biOA//c8j3bK6pzr5iDo4s08MTI9jKIYEtERyOizoh27yPwdXsMImsS03dE7jV
> 9POzbUD1O9VsaWIgYQOqaQgwGqKPTIfNHmoQ8Fcr3l0VO4BJsyJcuWQFPg7r1+MH
> lmhHFhpFa2AOZgG9vWIiV7DTyIp4X/GBSgGIZuBIrxl3ENORLW1S2TxgVciBynyq
> ALnmfkU3B6ggUyFNT1SFZEoYHv2RzUGn6HAgU1YUuQzRb3eRciySpOfomuXENGBo
> gR2Q904uRMsWEZMvszEvY2gJlLgFsmdCNzHLCrlfEBL9VJ60gIBe4HUo5ApGNobB
> mdhlm3ai0q2a3+x8tES20zKdQolDCVxK3xXbCrfVsRWrw6nQywlvy9wlpVltM3xc
> zpDAkdIAzEtO54yw2iCCcIz1yfoJodyBIbPoWXRZ21Dv5YulYuSEWLzvVD1EOh23
> b7KnuIcaZG+Ke/U4CGpBwgq1fpn/fE2P6VWFlXJ8++UbGOD5DSHdKehrfpxQCItI
> plAazQEujGJFCz4RNs2Pg8vv4N1cgxMVH+603i76+ggl3dq4hBVBSgpB/V1qwYue
> 2hto31wBFPBZSVx+heOdQqoHNWWGk48MegnPhPvFEsxrNVeSVt6M2Tav0mxDPM9z
> N/FOOgh6S6Fe4WqhmTaD/QtuQKq00j3A85lvo+zgDU6noteNn2k=
> =CDtQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
signatures OK
compare source-release with svn tag : OK
issues-fixed report: OK
api-change-reports: OK
build from sources: OK
ran document analyzer from bin package, viewed results- OK
installed plugins into Eclipse 2018-12 OK
imported example project into Eclipse, it built OK, ran document analyzer: OK
made new type system descriptor, ran JCasGen: OK
compare licenses with 3.0.0 - no change
spot check licenses in staging repo: OK
[x] +1 OK to release
- -Marshall Schor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=CDtQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi everyone,
First of all, thanks to everyone for testing :-)
I have a rather big project where I'm testing uima v2 vs v3, and comparing the
results, and saw a very occasional difference, which I finally tracked down:
it's a bug in the Subiterator implementation for some edge cases.
So, I want to fix that, add some test cases, etc.
I'll also take Richard's good advice and change to 3.1.0 and mention the change
done to align the code with the Javadocs (they were inconsistent), as described
in UIMA-5869.
-Marshall
On 3/25/2019 7:48 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> So, RC builds good and I have tried it out in the context of several of my projects
> (some of which I first had to update since their v3 branches were seriously outdated).
> Except the issue mentioned below, all seems to be fine.
>
> I think the RC would better be released as v3.1.0 because of the switch from
> CASRuntimeException to CASException. Also, I think this changed should be made
> prominent in the release notes under "Specific changes in release 3.0.2 versus 3.0.1 include".
>
> But anyway, if you want to release as-is, I'm +1 with that as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 20. Mar 2019, at 14:24, Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm having a look.
>>
>> So far, I have:
>> - compiled the UIMA Core 3.0.2 code ok
>> - compiled the uimaFIT 3.0.0 branch against the 3.0.2 RC - kind of ok
>> There are uimaFIT unit tests failing which expect a CASRuntimeException when a view
>> is missing because this has been changed to generating a CASException. I think this
>> change should cause the version to be increased in the mid-position (i.e. 3.1.0).
>> - now trying to compile the v3 branches of DKPro Core and WebAnno against the RC...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Richard
>
Re: [VOTE] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
So, RC builds good and I have tried it out in the context of several of my projects
(some of which I first had to update since their v3 branches were seriously outdated).
Except the issue mentioned below, all seems to be fine.
I think the RC would better be released as v3.1.0 because of the switch from
CASRuntimeException to CASException. Also, I think this changed should be made
prominent in the release notes under "Specific changes in release 3.0.2 versus 3.0.1 include".
But anyway, if you want to release as-is, I'm +1 with that as well.
Cheers,
-- Richard
> On 20. Mar 2019, at 14:24, Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'm having a look.
>
> So far, I have:
> - compiled the UIMA Core 3.0.2 code ok
> - compiled the uimaFIT 3.0.0 branch against the 3.0.2 RC - kind of ok
> There are uimaFIT unit tests failing which expect a CASRuntimeException when a view
> is missing because this has been changed to generating a CASException. I think this
> change should cause the version to be increased in the mid-position (i.e. 3.1.0).
> - now trying to compile the v3 branches of DKPro Core and WebAnno against the RC...
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Uimaj-3.0.2 rc1
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
I'm having a look.
So far, I have:
- compiled the UIMA Core 3.0.2 code ok
- compiled the uimaFIT 3.0.0 branch against the 3.0.2 RC - kind of ok
There are uimaFIT unit tests failing which expect a CASRuntimeException when a view
is missing because this has been changed to generating a CASException. I think this
change should cause the version to be increased in the mid-position (i.e. 3.1.0).
- now trying to compile the v3 branches of DKPro Core and WebAnno against the RC...
Cheers,
-- Richard