You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@groovy.apache.org by Russel Winder <ru...@winder.org.uk> on 2016/12/19 06:34:39 UTC
Re: Build fail on JDK9
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:34 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:26 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> > You always forget to give me precise details! 😜
> > JDK 9 is a very vague context!
>
> What is the latest JDK9?
Having actually read the Oracle JDK9 EA licence, I find I (and I
suspect almost everyone) cannot comply with the terms as stated (as
opposed to the ones probably intended). I have therefore removed all my
Oracle JDK9 installs so as to be compliant.
Until Fedora Rawhide has an OpenJDK9 package, I won't be running JDK9
on that platform. Debian Experimental has an OpenJDK9 package so over
Christmas I will be installing and using that. So for now OpenJDK8
only, and hence no Gradle problems. Also no Asciidoctor problem so I
can build the documentation again.
Once I have both OpenJDK8 and OpenJDK9, I should be able to start work
on getting GPars 2.0 into a fit state for release.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Re: Build fail on JDK9
Posted by Russel Winder <ru...@winder.org.uk>.
On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 09:06 +0100, jim northrop wrote:
> Will we be needing any doco changes for GPars 2.0 Russel ?
>
Yes.
Everything except the data parallelism will just need a light sub-edit.
Everything in the data parallel section will need either deleting a
rewriting to show how things are done with Streams.
The question is whether to make a GPars 1.3 release at all, and whether
to just make the docs (especially those on the GPars website) GPars 2.0
specific on the grounds that anyone using GPars will be using JDK8 and
so GPars 2.0.
Anyone sticking with GPars 1.2.x is either on Android or should upgrade
their JVM and hence GPars. :-)
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Re: Build fail on JDK9
Posted by jim northrop <ja...@googlemail.com>.
Will we be needing any doco changes for GPars 2.0 Russel ?
On 19 December 2016 at 07:34, Russel Winder <ru...@winder.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:34 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:26 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> > > You always forget to give me precise details! 😜
> > > JDK 9 is a very vague context!
> >
> > What is the latest JDK9?
>
> Having actually read the Oracle JDK9 EA licence, I find I (and I
> suspect almost everyone) cannot comply with the terms as stated (as
> opposed to the ones probably intended). I have therefore removed all my
> Oracle JDK9 installs so as to be compliant.
>
> Until Fedora Rawhide has an OpenJDK9 package, I won't be running JDK9
> on that platform. Debian Experimental has an OpenJDK9 package so over
> Christmas I will be installing and using that. So for now OpenJDK8
> only, and hence no Gradle problems. Also no Asciidoctor problem so I
> can build the documentation again.
>
> Once I have both OpenJDK8 and OpenJDK9, I should be able to start work
> on getting GPars 2.0 into a fit state for release.
>
> --
> Russel.
> ============================================================
> =================
> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip:
> sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder