You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Frank Gynnild (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/11/29 08:35:40 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-356) Inactivity monitor (or another background task) cause a NullPointerException in ActiveMQ

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159139#comment-13159139 ] 

Frank Gynnild commented on AMQNET-356:
--------------------------------------

I've been testing some more with the latest ActiveMQ.Net 1.5.2, but I run into the java.lang.NullPointerException on the ActiveMQ host side from time to time,
and the client isn't able to recover after that unless I restart. If I switch back to 1.5.1 there are no signs of it. 

Has anyone else experienced this issue?
                
> Inactivity monitor (or another background task) cause a NullPointerException in ActiveMQ
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-356
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: NMS
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.2, 1.5.3
>         Environment: Tested with both Active MQ 5.5, 5.6
> and ActiveMQ.Net 1.5.2 and 1.5.3.
> Broker URI: 
> failover:(tcp://127.0.0.1:61616?nms.PrefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=0&keepAlive=true&wireFormat.TightEncodingEnabled=false&wireFormat.CacheEnabled=false&wireFormat.MaxInactivityDuration=300000)
>            Reporter: Frank Gynnild
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>            Priority: Critical
>
> We're running various automatic unit tests that ran fine for ActiveMQ.NMS 1.5.1, but that always fail
> at the same spot when we test with the new 1.5.2 (or latest 1.5.3). Strangely, it fails between two
> tests, but it didn't used to do that before. Running these two tests alone doesn't provoke the situation
> so its been hard to isolate it. Since it is consistent, I thought it was best to create an
> issue here, maybe you have some hints on what's going on. I think it's a bug though, because
> we're using the failover protocol, yet the connection exception get raised through this handler:
> {code}
> connection.ExceptionListener += ConnectionExceptionListener;
> {code}
> When using failover, I don't think we ever should see the exception listener being called, right?
> Only got this information so it's not much:
> ---
> Type: Apache.NMS.NMSConnectionException. Message: Exception of type 'Apache.NMS.NMSConnectionException' was thrown.
> ---
> *Before* this happens, we also see this in the ActiveMQ broker:
> 2011-11-23 09:47:18,458 | WARN  | Async error occurred: java.lang.NullPointerException | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Service | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:54782
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.getConsumerBrokerExchange(TransportConnection.java:1349)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processMessageAck(TransportConnection.java:474)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.command.MessageAck.visit(MessageAck.java:229)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConnection.java:316)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:180)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFilter.java:69)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(WireFormatNegotiator.java:113)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand(InactivityMonitor.java:227)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSupport.java:83)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:223)
> 	at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:205)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> Thanks for any ideas on this. I'll be more than happy to test any code, since it can be produced every time
> with the 1.5.2 release.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira