You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> on 2004/02/28 04:15:05 UTC
Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Craig Robson <cr...@zhatt.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Summers" <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
To: "Chris Croome" <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
Cc: <us...@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Chris Croome wrote:
>
> > Trying to install the new db4 rpms doesn't work for me using -ivh (I
> > don't want to do a forced install):
> >
> > # rpm -ivh db4*.rpm
> > Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
> > file /usr/include/db4/db.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/include/db4/db_185.h from install of
db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/include/db4/db_cxx.h from install of
db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/lib/libdb.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so from install of db4-tcl-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/berkeley_db_svc from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_archive from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_checkpoint from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_deadlock from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_dump from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_dump185 from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_load from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_printlog from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_recover from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_stat from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_upgrade from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> > file /usr/bin/db_verify from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3
conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
>
> You (probably) don't need the db4-devel-4.2.52 RPM. You may or may not
> need the db4-utils-4.2.52. For both of those (at the moment) you could
> choose either the db4-4.1.25 version or the db4-4.2.52 version.
>
> If there is a better way to do it then please let me know. I've thought
> about it some and not been able to think of a great way to do it where
> both utils and devel versions are concurrently loaded. Personally I have
> never had a problem with just using the newer versions, but depending on
> your usage, I could conceive of a case where it might be necessary to use
> both at the same time.
>
>
Here is what I did to install David's RPMs on a Fedora Core 1 Box.
# Get rid of a bunch of packages that depend might cause some problems. I
assume
# that if you really need any of these packages you'll know how to install
the
# correct versions of this stuff.
rpm --erase db4-devel apr-util-devel httpd-devel subversion-devel
mod_perl-devel
rpm --erase apr-devel neon-devel mod_dav_svn
rpm --erase db4-java
# We'll upgrade the db4-utils but install the main db4 package. This will
leave
# the 4.1 version of db4 intact. Bunches of packages require 4.1 db so this
# will keep them happy.
rpm --upgrade db4-utils-4.2.52-3.i386.rpm
rpm --install db4-4.2.52-3.i386.rpm
# Finally, upgrade the subversion packages.
rpm --upgrade apr-0.9.5-0.3.i386.rpm \
apr-util-0.9.5-0.3.i386.rpm \
neon-0.24.4-1.i386.rpm \
subversion-1.0.0-2.fc1.i386.rpm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Chris Croome wrote:
> Trying to install the new db4 rpms doesn't work for me using -ivh (I
> don't want to do a forced install):
>
> # rpm -ivh db4*.rpm
> Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
> file /usr/include/db4/db.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/include/db4/db_185.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/include/db4/db_cxx.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/lib/libdb.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so from install of db4-tcl-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/berkeley_db_svc from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_archive from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_checkpoint from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_deadlock from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_dump from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_dump185 from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_load from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_printlog from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_recover from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_stat from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_upgrade from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
> file /usr/bin/db_verify from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
You (probably) don't need the db4-devel-4.2.52 RPM. You may or may not
need the db4-utils-4.2.52. For both of those (at the moment) you could
choose either the db4-4.1.25 version or the db4-4.2.52 version.
If there is a better way to do it then please let me know. I've thought
about it some and not been able to think of a great way to do it where
both utils and devel versions are concurrently loaded. Personally I have
never had a problem with just using the newer versions, but depending on
your usage, I could conceive of a case where it might be necessary to use
both at the same time.
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi
On Mon 01-Mar-2004 at 08:42:58AM -0600, David Summers wrote:
>
> It looks like you deleted the db4-4.1.25. Don't do that. Just
> install the new db4-4.2.52 along with it.
Trying to install the new db4 rpms doesn't work for me using -ivh (I
don't want to do a forced install):
# rpm -ivh db4*.rpm
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
file /usr/include/db4/db.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
file /usr/include/db4/db_185.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
file /usr/include/db4/db_cxx.h from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
file /usr/lib/libdb.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
file /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.so from install of db4-devel-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-devel-4.1.25-14
file /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so from install of db4-tcl-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/berkeley_db_svc from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_archive from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_checkpoint from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_deadlock from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_dump from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_dump185 from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_load from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_printlog from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_recover from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_stat from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_upgrade from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
file /usr/bin/db_verify from install of db4-utils-4.2.52-3 conflicts with file from package db4-utils-4.1.25-14
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi
On Mon 01-Mar-2004 at 08:39:58AM -0500, Toshio wrote:
>
> I'm interested to hear if anyone else has done this as I'd think
> you'd at least have to upgrade php as well. I suspect there'd be
> problems having apache running with db4.2 and mod_php compiled
> against db4.1 attempt to load. Could anyone verify if my
> suspicion is correct or if the OS is actually able to deal with
> this?
This is my worry, the box I was looking at upgrading is runing
several PHP web sites and I don't want to break them if I can aviod
it :-)
Chris
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Toshio <to...@tiki-lounge.com>.
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 08:04, Chris Croome wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat 28-Feb-2004 at 12:28:59 -0600, David Summers wrote:
> >
> > > > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then
> > > > they will need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2
> > > > version as the old one used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one
> > > > uses 4.2.52.
> > > >
> > > > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> Is there way around this (on Fedora 1):
>
> # rpm -Fvh *.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) python-2.2.3-7
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-6
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) perl-5.8.1-92
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) webalizer-2.01_10-14
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) postfix-2.0.16-8.tls.fc1
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) php-4.3.4-1.1
> db4 = 4.1.25 is needed by (installed) pam-0.77-15
>
> That doesn't involve me rebuilding rpms of all the above packages?
I haven't tried this but...
Most of those might be satisfied if you get the compat-db-4 package from
Fedora Rawhide.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS
(Since Fedora Core 2 will use db4.2, you could probably grab other
updates needing db4.2 as well.)
I'm interested to hear if anyone else has done this as I'd think you'd
at least have to upgrade php as well. I suspect there'd be problems
having apache running with db4.2 and mod_php compiled against db4.1
attempt to load. Could anyone verify if my suspicion is correct or if
the OS is actually able to deal with this?
-Toshio
--
Toshio <to...@tiki-lounge.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi
On Mon 01-Mar-2004 at 05:45:01AM -0800, Raymond wrote:
>
> Does any know of utilizing --force and symlinking libdb-4.1.so to
> the newer build will break anytihing?
I stoped using --force for anything since I started using apt for
updating -- apt refuses to work if installed have been forced...
However it might also break other things...?
Chris
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Raymond <su...@bigriverinfotech.com>.
> > > > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> Is there way around this (on Fedora 1):
>
> # rpm -Fvh *.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) python-2.2.3-7
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-6
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) perl-5.8.1-92
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) webalizer-2.01_10-14
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) postfix-2.0.16-8.tls.fc1
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) php-4.3.4-1.1
> db4 = 4.1.25 is needed by (installed) pam-0.77-15
>
> That doesn't involve me rebuilding rpms of all the above packages?
I, too have the same problems and am current with the yum repository.
Does any know of utilizing --force and symlinking libdb-4.1.so to the newer
build will break anytihing?
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
It looks like you deleted the db4-4.1.25. Don't do that. Just install
the new db4-4.2.52 along with it.
- David Summers
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Chris Croome wrote:
> On Sat 28-Feb-2004 at 12:28:59 -0600, David Summers wrote:
> >
> > > > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then
> > > > they will need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2
> > > > version as the old one used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one
> > > > uses 4.2.52.
> > > >
> > > > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> Is there way around this (on Fedora 1):
>
> # rpm -Fvh *.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) python-2.2.3-7
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-6
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) perl-5.8.1-92
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) webalizer-2.01_10-14
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) postfix-2.0.16-8.tls.fc1
> libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) php-4.3.4-1.1
> db4 = 4.1.25 is needed by (installed) pam-0.77-15
>
> That doesn't involve me rebuilding rpms of all the above packages?
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi
On Sat 28-Feb-2004 at 12:28:59 -0600, David Summers wrote:
>
> > > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then
> > > they will need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2
> > > version as the old one used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one
> > > uses 4.2.52.
> > >
> > > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
Is there way around this (on Fedora 1):
# rpm -Fvh *.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) python-2.2.3-7
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-6
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) perl-5.8.1-92
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) webalizer-2.01_10-14
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) postfix-2.0.16-8.tls.fc1
libdb-4.1.so is needed by (installed) php-4.3.4-1.1
db4 = 4.1.25 is needed by (installed) pam-0.77-15
That doesn't involve me rebuilding rpms of all the above packages?
Thanks
Chris
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
> > I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> > Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
> >
> > I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
> >
> > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> > need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> > used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
> >
> > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> URL?
>
http://subversion.tigris.org/project_packages.html
or
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/1.0.0
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
> > I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> > Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
> >
> > I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
> >
> > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> > need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> > used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
> >
> > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> URL?
>
http://subversion.tigris.org/project_packages.html
or
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/1.0.0
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org>.
David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
> I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
>
> I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
>
> If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
>
> If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
URL?
--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
Ooops, I'll check into it this evening. Thanks for the info.
- David
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 smishra@speakeasy.net wrote:
> I've run into a minor problem upgrading to svn 1.0. The fedora headers
> list mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.hdr, but yum reports the file
> http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/fedora/bin/mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.rpm
> as missing. Help?
>
> Otherwise, manually installing db 4.2 then doing a yum update on
> specific packages worked fine for me. I'll have to figure out what I
> should do about devel, util, etc. Perhaps I'll just erase them, as
> another post had suggested.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sunil
>
> David Summers wrote:
> > I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> > Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
> >
> > I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
> >
> > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> > need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> > used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
> >
> > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
Ooops, I'll check into it this evening. Thanks for the info.
- David
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 smishra@speakeasy.net wrote:
> I've run into a minor problem upgrading to svn 1.0. The fedora headers
> list mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.hdr, but yum reports the file
> http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/fedora/bin/mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.rpm
> as missing. Help?
>
> Otherwise, manually installing db 4.2 then doing a yum update on
> specific packages worked fine for me. I'll have to figure out what I
> should do about devel, util, etc. Perhaps I'll just erase them, as
> another post had suggested.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sunil
>
> David Summers wrote:
> > I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> > Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
> >
> > I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
> >
> > If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> > need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> > used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
> >
> > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by sm...@speakeasy.net.
I've run into a minor problem upgrading to svn 1.0. The fedora headers
list mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.hdr, but yum reports the file
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/fedora/bin/mod_ssl-2.0.48-1.2.1.i386.rpm
as missing. Help?
Otherwise, manually installing db 4.2 then doing a yum update on
specific packages worked fine for me. I'll have to figure out what I
should do about devel, util, etc. Perhaps I'll just erase them, as
another post had suggested.
Thanks!
Sunil
David Summers wrote:
> I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
>
> I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
>
> If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
>
> If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Craig Robson <cr...@zhatt.com>.
I'm using the httpd-2.0.48-3.i386.rpm for Redhat 9 you built. I ran a bunch
of tests (svn http tests only not other http tests) and it worked great. I
actually settled on svnserve after testing both http: and svn: for the
repository.
For the record I am using the following RPMs from
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/redhat-9.0/bin/.
apr-0.9.5-0.2.i386.rpm
apr-util-0.9.5-0.1.i386.rpm
httpd-2.0.48-3.i386.rpm
subversion-1.0.0-1.rh90.i386.rpm
subversion-server-1.0.0-1.rh90.i386.rpm
subversion-tools-1.0.0-1.rh90.i386.rpm
Thanks.
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Summers" <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
To: "Craig Robson" <cr...@zhatt.com>
Cc: <us...@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Craig Robson wrote:
>
> > I've found that the Redhat 9 RPMs work fine on WBEL3. You need the
> > compat-db rpm installed so it can run with db 4.0.
> >
>
> Did you use the existing Fedora httpd when you did that? I'm worried
> about that because the existing Fedora is httpd-2.0.47 (and compiled with
> the infamous db4-4.1.25).
>
> --
> David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware
upgrades!"
> david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key:
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
> PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Craig Robson wrote:
> I've found that the Redhat 9 RPMs work fine on WBEL3. You need the
> compat-db rpm installed so it can run with db 4.0.
>
Did you use the existing Fedora httpd when you did that? I'm worried
about that because the existing Fedora is httpd-2.0.47 (and compiled with
the infamous db4-4.1.25).
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Craig Robson <cr...@zhatt.com>.
Thanks for providing these RPMs.
I've found that the Redhat 9 RPMs work fine on WBEL3. You need the
compat-db rpm installed so it can run with db 4.0.
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Croome" <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
To: <us...@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
> Hi David
>
> On Fri 27-Feb-2004 at 10:15:05PM -0600, David Summers wrote:
> >
> > I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
>
> Great :-)
>
> > If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
>
> I noticed that you have built Apache also -- is this required or do
> your Fedora RPMs run with the Fedora Apache (I'd rather not upgrade
> Apache right now if I can avoid it since various Perl and PHP
> applications are currently working and I fear I might break
> something...).
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
> web content management http://mkdoc.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Chris Croome wrote:
> I noticed that you have built Apache also -- is this required or do
> your Fedora RPMs run with the Fedora Apache (I'd rather not upgrade
> Apache right now if I can avoid it since various Perl and PHP
> applications are currently working and I fear I might break
> something...).
>
Yes, Subversion requires httpd-2.0.48. I've not (yet) gone through
extensive testing but I grabbed the httpd-2.0.48 from the Fedora
development directory so I'm hoping it won't break any existing apps.
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi David
On Fri 27-Feb-2004 at 10:15:05PM -0600, David Summers wrote:
>
> I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
Great :-)
> If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
I noticed that you have built Apache also -- is this required or do
your Fedora RPMs run with the Fedora Apache (I'd rather not upgrade
Apache right now if I can avoid it since various Perl and PHP
applications are currently working and I fear I might break
something...).
Chris
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Fedora RPMs (and RHEL3/WBEL3)
Posted by Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org>.
David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
> I finally figured out the magic incantation to get Fedora (and Redhat
> Enterprise Linux 3 / Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3) to build Subversion.
>
> I've put a rebuilt Fedora 1.0.0-2 RPM suite on my server.
>
> If anyone was using the old 0.37.0 or 1.0.0-1 Fedora RPMs then they will
> need to do a dump/reload session with the new 1.0.0-2 version as the old one
> used Berkeley DB 4.1.25 and the new one uses 4.2.52.
>
> If anyone has questions or problems with them, please let me know.
URL?
--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org