You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2006/09/19 17:31:31 UTC
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-927) Cleanup code in the monitor to clarify
the relationship between StorageFactory and PersistentService
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-927?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-927:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 10.2.2.0
(was: 10.2.1.0)
Moving to 10.2.2.0.
> Cleanup code in the monitor to clarify the relationship between StorageFactory and PersistentService
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-927
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-927
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Services
> Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
> Assigned To: Daniel John Debrunner
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.2.2.0
>
>
> The addition of the StorageFactory code into the BaseMonitor code muddied the water with respect to what is a service and what is a storage factory.
> Cleanup the code and add comments and/or a package.html to describe what is going on.
> Look at loading the storage factories through the modules.properties rather than the hard-coded list and thus gain the benefit of the standard module environment
> checking (jvm level and dependent classes) and ensure classes are loaded from modules.properties consistently.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira