You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com> on 2011/06/07 14:30:26 UTC

Move trunk to 2.5 after 2.4.1?

I've (mostly) completed a restructuring of the WS-RM code and tests to 
allow interoperability with other stacks using WS-Addressing 1.5 with 
WS-RM 1.0, and to add support for WS-RM 1.1/1.2. To avoid any 
compatibility issues I've kept the CXF defaults to WS-RM 1.0 using the 
submission (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing) version of 
WS-Addressing, and that's mostly what I've been testing with so far.

I'd like to get the new code checked in so others can have access and 
start contributing bugs and fixes, but given the size of the change it's 
probably safer to do this outside of the current working version. So I 
propose branching after the upcoming 2.4.1 release, and starting 2.5 on 
the trunk. That way I can check this in as part of the build up to 2.5, 
and it'll give us some nice new WS-RM features to help justify the point 
release.

What do the other committers think of this?

Thanks,

   - Dennis

Re: Move trunk to 2.5 after 2.4.1?

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
I completely agree with this.    Once 2.4.1 is built, I'll go ahead and create 
the branch and we can start hacking away on trunk again.  :-)


Dan


On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:30:26 AM Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> I've (mostly) completed a restructuring of the WS-RM code and tests to
> allow interoperability with other stacks using WS-Addressing 1.5 with
> WS-RM 1.0, and to add support for WS-RM 1.1/1.2. To avoid any
> compatibility issues I've kept the CXF defaults to WS-RM 1.0 using the
> submission (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing) version of
> WS-Addressing, and that's mostly what I've been testing with so far.
> 
> I'd like to get the new code checked in so others can have access and
> start contributing bugs and fixes, but given the size of the change it's
> probably safer to do this outside of the current working version. So I
> propose branching after the upcoming 2.4.1 release, and starting 2.5 on
> the trunk. That way I can check this in as part of the build up to 2.5,
> and it'll give us some nice new WS-RM features to help justify the point
> release.
> 
> What do the other committers think of this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    - Dennis

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Move trunk to 2.5 after 2.4.1?

Posted by Aki Yoshida <el...@googlemail.com>.
sounds very good.
regards, aki

2011/6/7 Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>:
> I've (mostly) completed a restructuring of the WS-RM code and tests to allow
> interoperability with other stacks using WS-Addressing 1.5 with WS-RM 1.0,
> and to add support for WS-RM 1.1/1.2. To avoid any compatibility issues I've
> kept the CXF defaults to WS-RM 1.0 using the submission
> (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing) version of WS-Addressing,
> and that's mostly what I've been testing with so far.
>
> I'd like to get the new code checked in so others can have access and start
> contributing bugs and fixes, but given the size of the change it's probably
> safer to do this outside of the current working version. So I propose
> branching after the upcoming 2.4.1 release, and starting 2.5 on the trunk.
> That way I can check this in as part of the build up to 2.5, and it'll give
> us some nice new WS-RM features to help justify the point release.
>
> What do the other committers think of this?
>
> Thanks,
>
>  - Dennis
>
>