migration from 1.1 to 1.2?

[Ken Liu <ke...@gmail.com>]

So, did we establish whether the migration tool is needed for 1.1 -> 1.2? I
thought from the discussion last week that it is still required. If that is
the case, then the migration page on the site needs to be updated, as it
currently says that no migration is needed.

Ken

Re: migration from 1.1 to 1.2?

[Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>]

Here [1] the sql command if you want CONTINUUM-1688 fixed.

--
Olivier

[1] : http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.2/installation/upgrade.html

2008/9/26 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
> I think it is not needed in its basic form, but if you need to expand the
> size of any fields it is, and the data management tool should work as
> before.
>
> Is that right?
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 1:49 AM, Ken Liu wrote:
>
>> So, did we establish whether the migration tool is needed for 1.1 -> 1.2?
>> I
>> thought from the discussion last week that it is still required. If that
>> is
>> the case, then the migration page on the site needs to be updated, as it
>> currently says that no migration is needed.
>>
>> Ken
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>

Re: migration from 1.1 to 1.2?

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

I think it is not needed in its basic form, but if you need to expand  
the size of any fields it is, and the data management tool should work  
as before.

Is that right?

On 23/09/2008, at 1:49 AM, Ken Liu wrote:

> So, did we establish whether the migration tool is needed for 1.1 ->  
> 1.2? I
> thought from the discussion last week that it is still required. If  
> that is
> the case, then the migration page on the site needs to be updated,  
> as it
> currently says that no migration is needed.
>
> Ken

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/