svn commit: r1002368 - in /websites/staging/community/trunk/content: ./ committers/consensusBuilding.html

[bu...@apache.org]

Author: buildbot
Date: Wed Dec  7 14:40:21 2016
New Revision: 1002368

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for community

Modified:
    websites/staging/community/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/community/trunk/content/committers/consensusBuilding.html

Propchange: websites/staging/community/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Wed Dec  7 14:40:21 2016
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1773087
+1773088

Modified: websites/staging/community/trunk/content/committers/consensusBuilding.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/community/trunk/content/committers/consensusBuilding.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/community/trunk/content/committers/consensusBuilding.html Wed Dec  7 14:40:21 2016
@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ used in a formal vote. Knowing when some
 preference is important. It's easy to tell though, if the subject does not have 
 "[Vote]" at the start then it's just an opinion. We try not to call votes,
 consensus building is much more inclusive.</p>
-<p>The reasons for this notation being common is 
-that when someone wants to summarise a discussion thread they can mentally 
+<p>The reasons for this notation being common is that when someone wants to
+summarise a discussion thread they can mentally 
 add up the strength of feeling of the community and decide if there is consensus
 or not.</p>
 <p>Once there is a clear consensus members of the community can proceed with