You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Adrian C <ad...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/04 11:38:09 UTC
Re: jaxws binding issue
Hi Dan,
Finally got around to testing this in 2.0.8 - all looking good. Thanks for
the help.
Adrian
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> The changes are committed to svn. I probably won't have a chance to do
> a new snapshot today, but if you checkout the latest from SVN, you can
> give it a try.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> Adrian Corcoran wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> Great work as always! Thanks for the update. Let me know when you have
>> the
>> patches applied and I will give it a test.
>>
>> Will give the work arounds a try in the mean time,
>>
>> Keep up the good work!
>>
>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Adrian,
>>>
>>> Just dug into these and found a bunch of issues with the applications of
>>> the bindings file. Thanks for the test cases.
>>>
>>> In the "case 2" that you have, it MIGHT work if you add a top level
>>> xsd:annotation/xsd:appinfo element to the schema. It can be blank, but
>>> it
>>> should be. The code seems to be using the wrong method to find it and
>>> it's
>>> actually finding the first in the whole tree, not the immediate child of
>>> schema. Thus, the global binding stuff is added to the one in TestEnum
>>> and
>>> then screwing everything up.
>>>
>>> "case 3" has other issues. Digging into the code, there are definite
>>> issues if a jaxws:bindings element has multiple jaxb binding things in
>>> it.
>>> It looks like only the first jaxb:bindings element is honored and
>>> jaxb:globalBindings isn't honored at all if there is a jaxb:bindings.
>>>
>>> Thus, you MAY be able to work around it with multiple jaxws:bindings
>>> elements, each with a single jaxb extensor in it.
>>>
>>> In anycase, I should have fixes for it shortly. With the Apache SVN
>>> issues, I'm not sure if I'll get it committed today or not.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian C wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Glen
>>>> Thanks for the reply - there are so many connotations of this its
>>>> crazy!
>>>> :)
>>>> But have created a JIRA issue.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1565
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be a work around, however its not one that will work for
>>>> me.
>>>> There is an interoperability issue between CXF and .NET 2.0 ... problem
>>>> seems to be on the .net side. .NET 2.0 is not able to handle dates in
>>>> the
>>>> format yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T00:00:00' zzzzzz? (the lexical
>>>> representation)
>>>> it is only able to handle the canonical representation. Therefore to
>>>> help
>>>> any .NET consumers of our service, we plan to able to specify our own
>>>> class
>>>> generate xsd:date as cononical format always and to parse either.
>>>> However we
>>>> don;t want out java users to have to have our date parsing class on
>>>> their
>>>> classpath to generate their consumer! So having the xsd:date
>>>> customisation
>>>> inline is not a runner for us!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Adrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Glen Mazza-2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please take a look at our bindings samples:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/wsdl-to-java.html#WSDLtoJava-JAXWSCustomization
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anything related to your problem--if you try to configure the
>>>>> binding
>>>>> in a different manner (within WSDL, or separate on command line), do
>>>>> the
>>>>> same problems occur?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, I would recommend sending a JIRA report on this problem
>>>>> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF)--give<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF%29--give>us
>>>>> the simplest WSDL
>>>>> and binding file that works like a charm on Metro but raises problems
>>>>> with CXF.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that CXF uses the same JAXB library as Metro, so anything
>>>>> JAXB-related should be the same between the two WS stacks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Glen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008-04-24 Adrian C wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Has no one come across an issue similar to this - am lead to believe
>>>>>> its
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> bug in the wsdl2java tooling as I can get this to work with
>>>>>> wsimport!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adrian C wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am having some problems with jaxw binding customizations.
>>>>>>> The first problem that I am having is mixing a globalBindings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> definition
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with a bindings - the global bindings seems to be ignored. For the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> example
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> below if I use it as is, I only get my typesafeEnumClass
>
>>>>>>> generated. My
>>>>>>> instances of XMLGregorianCalendar are not replaced with
>>>>>>> java.util.Date.
>>>>>>> However, if I remove the jaxb:bindings node then the global
>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> works
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fine. Can anyone shed any light on this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The other issue I have is if I have in-lined customizations and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> external
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> customizations I cam getting an error reporting inconsistencies -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ever had this issue and resolved it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has all been doing my nut in - so any help would be
>>>>>>> appreciated!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <jaxws:bindings
>>>>>>> wsdlLocation="../Output/IdentityManagement_v1.wsdl"
>>>>>>> xmlns:jaxws="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws"
>>>>>>> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>>>>>>> xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
>>>>>>> xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>> <jaxws:bindings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:schema[@targetNamespace='
>>>>>> http://www.test.com/ws/de' <http://www.test.com/ws/de%27>]">
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <jaxb:globalBindings>
>>>>>>> <jaxb:javaType name="java.util.Date"
>>>>>>> xmlType="xsd:date"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> parseMethod="org.apache.cxf.tools.common.DataTypeAdapter.parseDate"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> printMethod="org.apache.cxf.tools.common.DataTypeAdapter.printDate"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> />
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </jaxb:globalBindings>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <jaxb:bindings
>>>>>>> node="./xsd:simpleType[@name='MyEnum']">
>>>>>>> <jaxb:typesafeEnumClass>
>>>>>>> <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember
>>>>>>> name="ZERO" value="0" />
>>>>>>> </jaxb:typesafeEnumClass>
>>>>>>> </jaxb:bindings>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </jaxws:bindings>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </jaxws:bindings>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jaxws-binding-issue-tp16823731p19306841.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.