You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Cameron McCormack <ca...@mcc.id.au> on 2007/12/03 07:10:34 UTC
Re: Maven artifacts for Batik
Carlos Sanchez:
> > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
Cameron McCormack:
> > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
> > wrong? (It says <groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId> in the POM
> > file for both.)
>
Carlos Sanchez:
> it's up to xmlgraphics project to decide how to subdivide the space
> for the subprojects
OK. (Jeremias and others, any opinion here? Unless there’s any issue
with it, I’ll choose org.apache.xmlgraphics as the groupId, to keep it
consistent.)
> > [mutual dependency with fop and batik]
> do you mean that fop needs batik to compile and batik needs fop?
> chicken and egg problem? how do you do that?
Well, it’s not quite true. Batik has an optional run-time dependency on
a pdf-transcoder.jar file that can be built from FOP. That
pdf-transcoder has a compile-time dependency on Batik. We deal with it
by having a copy of FOP’s pdf-transcoder.jar in Batik’s repository and a
copy of Batik’s jar in FOP’s repository. At some point some
disentaglement will be done by moving some stuff to xmlgraphics commons…
> > What's the difference? Artifacts in the m1-… directory can be used by
> > both Maven 1 and 2, but those in the m2-… directory can only be used by
> > Maven 2? (/me is a bit clueless about the difference between Maven 1
> > and 2).
>
> there's no difference, whether you deploy to the m1 or m2 repos it
> will be available for both m1 and m2 users. So only deploy to one of
> them.
OK.
Thanks,
--
Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Maven artifacts for Batik
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
On 03.12.2007 07:10:34 Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Carlos Sanchez:
> > > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
>
> Cameron McCormack:
> > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
> > > wrong? (It says <groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId> in the POM
> > > file for both.)
> >
> Carlos Sanchez:
> > it's up to xmlgraphics project to decide how to subdivide the space
> > for the subprojects
>
> OK. (Jeremias and others, any opinion here? Unless there’s any issue
> with it, I’ll choose org.apache.xmlgraphics as the groupId, to keep it
> consistent.)
IMO, it doesn't make much sense to further divide that.
group=project=all products released by one PMC.
<snip/>
Jeremias Maerki
Re: Maven artifacts for Batik
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
On 03.12.2007 07:10:34 Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Carlos Sanchez:
> > > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
>
> Cameron McCormack:
> > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
> > > wrong? (It says <groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId> in the POM
> > > file for both.)
> >
> Carlos Sanchez:
> > it's up to xmlgraphics project to decide how to subdivide the space
> > for the subprojects
>
> OK. (Jeremias and others, any opinion here? Unless there’s any issue
> with it, I’ll choose org.apache.xmlgraphics as the groupId, to keep it
> consistent.)
IMO, it doesn't make much sense to further divide that.
group=project=all products released by one PMC.
<snip/>
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org