You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by "Liya Fan (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/23 06:00:12 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4350) The reverse operation of collation
direction is overly relaxed
Liya Fan created CALCITE-4350:
---------------------------------
Summary: The reverse operation of collation direction is overly relaxed
Key: CALCITE-4350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4350
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core
Reporter: Liya Fan
Assignee: Liya Fan
For the current implementation, {{RelFieldCollation#Direction#reverse}} returns \{{DESCENDING}} for \{{STRICTLY_ASCENDING}}, and returns \{{ASCENDING}} for {{STRICTLY_DESCENDING}}.
This is overly relaxed. In a strict manner, it should return \{{STRICTLY_DESCENDING}} for \{{STRICTLY_ASCENDING}}, and vice versa.
If the user needs to get the relaxed reverse direction, they may call \{{collation.getDirection().reverse().lax();}}, as in many places of our code base.
Do you agree?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)