You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by "Liya Fan (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/23 06:00:12 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4350) The reverse operation of collation direction is overly relaxed

Liya Fan created CALCITE-4350:
---------------------------------

             Summary: The reverse operation of collation direction is overly relaxed
                 Key: CALCITE-4350
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4350
             Project: Calcite
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: core
            Reporter: Liya Fan
            Assignee: Liya Fan


For the current implementation, {{RelFieldCollation#Direction#reverse}} returns \{{DESCENDING}} for \{{STRICTLY_ASCENDING}}, and returns \{{ASCENDING}} for {{STRICTLY_DESCENDING}}.

This is overly relaxed. In a strict manner, it should return \{{STRICTLY_DESCENDING}} for \{{STRICTLY_ASCENDING}}, and vice versa. 

If the user needs to get the relaxed reverse direction, they may call \{{collation.getDirection().reverse().lax();}}, as in many places of our code base. 

Do you agree?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)