You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/03/23 11:25:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (MRESOLVER-346) Too eager locking
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17704081#comment-17704081 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MRESOLVER-346:
------------------------------------------
cstamas opened a new pull request, #272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/272
The locking in resolver is too eager. This PR relaxes locking by introducing use of shared locks (not used before) and following changes:
* installer
> Too eager locking
> -----------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-346
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-346
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Resolver
> Reporter: Tamas Cservenak
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.8
>
>
> The locking that is present in Resolver since 1.8.0 is too eager:
> * there are no shared locks used at all
> * this implies that local repository access is heavily serialized by locking
> * there is no "upgrade" of locking due that above
> * consequence is that "hot" artifacts in bigger multi module build run in parallel become bottleneck as all threads will wait for their moment to grab exclusive lock.
> We can do it better: there are 4 main areas where locking is used:
> * ArtifactInstaller: it is about to install (write) artifact files to local repository, it needs exclusive lock, *no change needed*.
> * ArtifactDeployer: it is about to upload present files to remote, it does not modifies anything on local. *Change it's lock to shared*. The exclusive lock also meant that if no DeployAtEnd used, other modules during resolution had to wait while this module uploaded.
> * ArtifactResolver and MetadataResolver: two very similar beasts, they attempt to resolve locally (from local repo) w/o any content modification (read only), and if not successful, they will reach remote to download what is needed (write). Here we *could do something similar to [DCL|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking] is*: try with shared lock first, and if local content is not fulfilling, release shared, acquire exclusive and REDO all (as meanwhile someone else may downloaded files already).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)