You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@xml.apache.org by "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com> on 2001/02/12 15:17:19 UTC
Performance?
Hi all, I'm wondering if anyone out there has any
performance numbers. Very simple would suffice, or
even any "expectations".
I ask, because after installing apache 1.3.17, tomcat
3.2.1, and Soap 2.1 - results are not what I was
expecting. Everything seems to *work* just fine,
but none too quickly. Here's an example from the
addressbook sample after the service has been
deployed:
$ time java samples.addressbook.GetAddress
http://localhost:8080/soap/servlet/rpcrouter "John B. Good"
123 Main Street
Anytown, NY 12345
(123) 456-7890
real 0m12.48s
user 0m9.08s
sys 0m1.98s
$
Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
And, this is on an SGI O2 platform. Not a speed demon,
but not a slouch either.
What are other people experiences?
And, admittedly - I'm pretty new to the SOAP world;
I could easily have something not configured correctly.
-Dan
--
Dan A. Dickey
ddickey@wamnet.com
SOAP Security
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
does anybody know of anyone that has implemented soap with digital
signature? Any thoughts on this new thing for SOAP? what's the difference
between using this and using https?
http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-dsig/
-----Original Message-----
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:filip@filip.net]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:55 PM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance?
>Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from?
wild guess,
initialize the random seed for the random generation for the session manager
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
filip@filip.net
www.filip.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Performance?
> "Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
> ...
> > Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
>
> Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
>
> I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
> the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
> of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
> I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from? Session setup or something?
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan A. Dickey
> ddickey@wamnet.com
>
SOAP Security
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
does anybody know of anyone that has implemented soap with digital
signature? Any thoughts on this new thing for SOAP? what's the difference
between using this and using https?
http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-dsig/
-----Original Message-----
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:filip@filip.net]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:55 PM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance?
>Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from?
wild guess,
initialize the random seed for the random generation for the session manager
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
filip@filip.net
www.filip.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Performance?
> "Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
> ...
> > Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
>
> Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
>
> I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
> the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
> of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
> I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from? Session setup or something?
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan A. Dickey
> ddickey@wamnet.com
>
Re: Performance?
Posted by Filip Hanik <fi...@filip.net>.
>Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from?
wild guess,
initialize the random seed for the random generation for the session manager
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
filip@filip.net
www.filip.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Performance?
> "Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
> ...
> > Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
>
> Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
>
> I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
> the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
> of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
> I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from? Session setup or something?
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan A. Dickey
> ddickey@wamnet.com
>
Re: Performance?
Posted by Filip Hanik <fi...@filip.net>.
>Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from?
wild guess,
initialize the random seed for the random generation for the session manager
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
filip@filip.net
www.filip.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Performance?
> "Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
> ...
> > Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
>
> Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
>
> I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
> the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
> of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
> I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
> comes from? Session setup or something?
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan A. Dickey
> ddickey@wamnet.com
>
Re: Performance?
Posted by "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>.
"Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
...
> Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
comes from? Session setup or something?
-Dan
--
Dan A. Dickey
ddickey@wamnet.com
Re: Performance?
Posted by "Dan A. Dickey" <dd...@wamnet.com>.
"Dan A. Dickey" wrote:
...
> Twelve and a half seconds seems *excessive* to me.
Ok, I did a bit more experimenting and I'm a bit happier now. :)
I threw a loop in around doing the call.invoke() and
the first call takes a while, and the rest take on the order
of 200 milliseconds each. Quite a bit better, and maybe something
I can deal with. Does anyone know where the large startup time
comes from? Session setup or something?
-Dan
--
Dan A. Dickey
ddickey@wamnet.com