You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com> on 2011/01/03 13:40:49 UTC
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
patch branches. WDYT?
Jamie
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
> release for that one on monday too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok, thanks
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>> fixed.
>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>> >> > missing:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>> >>
>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>> >
>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>> >>
>>> >> Which one is that?
>>> >
>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>> >> >
>>> >> > WDYT?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > kind regards,
>>> >> > andreas
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>> >> >> andreas
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> >> ------------------------
>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good, so just KARAF-343 left in the todo list :)
I'll start preparing my environment for a run at a Karaf 2.1.3 release
candidate.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem for not including new features is to reduce the risk of
> regressions and incompatbilities.
> I'd think this can be deferred to 2.2.0.
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:40, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
>> actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
>> requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
>> however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
>> patch branches. WDYT?
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
>>> release for that one on monday too.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ok, thanks
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>>>> fixed.
>>>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>>>> >> > missing:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Which one is that?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > WDYT?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > kind regards,
>>>>> >> > andreas
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>>>> >> >> andreas
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: release karaf-2.1.3?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The problem for not including new features is to reduce the risk of
regressions and incompatbilities.
I'd think this can be deferred to 2.2.0.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:40, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
> actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
> requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
> however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
> patch branches. WDYT?
>
> Jamie
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
>> release for that one on monday too.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ok, thanks
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> andreas
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>>> fixed.
>>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by now. Things
>>>> >> > missing:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release fails for me;
>>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>>> >
>>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts are not
>>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which one is that?
>>>> >
>>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date for 2.1 (when
>>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > WDYT?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > kind regards,
>>>> >> > andreas
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
>>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with already
>>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add one or
>>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want to
>>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>>> >> >> andreas
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com