You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by preben <pr...@dr.dk> on 2010/10/03 09:14:05 UTC

XMPP pubsub

Hi

Seems that camel-xmpp doesn't implement pubsub Smack features (XEP-0060
Publish-Subscribe). There is a jivesoftware library that supports pubsub,
and both ejabberd and openfire servers support pubsub.

Anybody have any ideas about at Camel component for this ? 
eg. create a new one or extend the existing xmpp component.

thanks
Preben 
-- 
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3074364.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by preben <pr...@dr.dk>.
The latest 3.1.0 doesn't support pubsub, but on trunc
http://svn.igniterealtime.org/svn/repos/smack/trunk/source/org/jivesoftware/smackx/pubsub/
the feature is implemented. Seems that only a release is needed.

An alternative would be nice since the latest Smack release is back in
20008. 

/preben

-- 
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3173539.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
We already have a ticket to upgrade to Smack 3.2.0 after Camel 2.8.0 is out.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4134

... and we love contributions... ;-)

Best,
Christian

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:36 PM, rcollier <ro...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> In case you are not aware, Smack 3.2 has been released and it includes the
> pubsub API in question.  In fact, there will be a 3.2.1 release in the next
> few weeks as well.
>
> Feel free to contact myself if you have any specific requests of Smack.
>
>
> hadrian wrote:
> >
> > You could, but we cannot include it with a dependency on a snapshot.
> > I am working on figuring out the best way to publish 3rd party releases
> in
> > the central repo, so that we avoid such issues.
> > It looks I also need to get in touch with the smack guys and see if they
> > have any plans for new releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hadrian
> >
> >
> > On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, preben wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub
> >> using
> >> a subproject of Smack as supposed by
> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.
> >>
> >> The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
> >> released.
> >>
> >> Should I attach a patch ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Preben
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
> >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p4532555.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by rcollier <ro...@hotmail.com>.
In case you are not aware, Smack 3.2 has been released and it includes the
pubsub API in question.  In fact, there will be a 3.2.1 release in the next
few weeks as well.

Feel free to contact myself if you have any specific requests of Smack.


hadrian wrote:
> 
> You could, but we cannot include it with a dependency on a snapshot.
> I am working on figuring out the best way to publish 3rd party releases in
> the central repo, so that we avoid such issues.
> It looks I also need to get in touch with the smack guys and see if they
> have any plans for new releases.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hadrian
> 
> 
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, preben wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub
>> using
>> a subproject of Smack as supposed by
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.
>> 
>> The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
>> released.
>> 
>> Should I attach a patch ?
>> 
>> Thanks 
>> Preben
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p4532555.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

Thanks for the contribution.
Can you create a JIRA[1] and submit the patch ? In this way we can keep 
tracking the issue easily.

BTW, maybe we could let servicemix bundle repo to load the specification 
version of smack.

[1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL

On 10/15/10 3:13 AM, preben wrote:
>
> Anyway I have attatched a patch you can use if and when you want.
> Some notes
> 1. Pubsub nodes are not created by the producer. They have to be created
> manually before starting producer/consumer.
> 2. SASLAuthentication should support other authentication mechanisms.
> 3. Collections with node's is not implemented.
> 4. Tested on ejabberd
>
> /Preben http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n3212666/patch.txt patch.txt


-- 
Willem
----------------------------------
Open Source Integration: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
          http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: http://twitter.com/willemjiang

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by preben <pr...@dr.dk>.
Anyway I have attatched a patch you can use if and when you want.
Some notes
1. Pubsub nodes are not created by the producer. They have to be created
manually before starting producer/consumer. 
2. SASLAuthentication should support other authentication mechanisms. 
3. Collections with node's is not implemented. 
4. Tested on ejabberd

/Preben http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n3212666/patch.txt patch.txt 
-- 
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3212666.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
That's the question. How accommodating should a community be with all the usage scenarios of its artifacts?
The only solution I see is to engage the smack guys and see what their interest is, what help they could use and how we could cooperate.
It's apache licensed, so personally I'm willing to help.

Hadrian


On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:

> Would they be the ones to supply osgi-ready bundles?  Or could Camel
> be bundled with an osgi'd version of the smack jars?
> 
> Don
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You could, but we cannot include it with a dependency on a snapshot.
>> I am working on figuring out the best way to publish 3rd party releases in the central repo, so that we avoid such issues.
>> It looks I also need to get in touch with the smack guys and see if they have any plans for new releases.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Hadrian
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, preben wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub using
>>> a subproject of Smack as supposed by
>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.
>>> 
>>> The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
>>> released.
>>> 
>>> Should I attach a patch ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Preben
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>>

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com>.
Would they be the ones to supply osgi-ready bundles?  Or could Camel
be bundled with an osgi'd version of the smack jars?

Don

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could, but we cannot include it with a dependency on a snapshot.
> I am working on figuring out the best way to publish 3rd party releases in the central repo, so that we avoid such issues.
> It looks I also need to get in touch with the smack guys and see if they have any plans for new releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, preben wrote:
>
>>
>> I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub using
>> a subproject of Smack as supposed by
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.
>>
>> The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
>> released.
>>
>> Should I attach a patch ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Preben
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
You could, but we cannot include it with a dependency on a snapshot.
I am working on figuring out the best way to publish 3rd party releases in the central repo, so that we avoid such issues.
It looks I also need to get in touch with the smack guys and see if they have any plans for new releases.

Thanks,
Hadrian


On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, preben wrote:

> 
> I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub using
> a subproject of Smack as supposed by
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.
> 
> The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
> released.
> 
> Should I attach a patch ?
> 
> Thanks 
> Preben
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by preben <pr...@dr.dk>.
I started extending the existing xmpp component to support xmpp pubsub using
a subproject of Smack as supposed by
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-td3199018.html#a3199018.

The existing Smack trunk includes pubsub support, but it hasn't been
released.

Should I attach a patch ?

Thanks 
Preben


-- 
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3210891.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XMPP pubsub

Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:14 AM, preben <pr...@dr.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Seems that camel-xmpp doesn't implement pubsub Smack features (XEP-0060
> Publish-Subscribe). There is a jivesoftware library that supports pubsub,
> and both ejabberd and openfire servers support pubsub.
>
> Anybody have any ideas about at Camel component for this ?
> eg. create a new one or extend the existing xmpp component.
>

We love contributions so if anyone want to help improving the existing
camel-xmpp.
Unfortunately Smack hasn't been released a new version in a while. I
think 3.1.0 is stil the latest version.
Could you check if Smack 3.1.0 supports the feature seek?

If anyone knows of better Java clients then I would like to know.

And feel free to create a ticket in JIRA for this.


> thanks
> Preben
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XMPP-pubsub-tp3074364p3074364.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus