You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@geode.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/01/20 22:53:26 UTC
[GitHub] [geode] onichols-pivotal opened a new pull request #5934: GEODE-8824 fix some rule overlap and unintended singleton codeowners
onichols-pivotal opened a new pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5934
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [geode] onichols-pivotal merged pull request #5934: GEODE-8824 fix some rule overlap and unintended singleton codeowners
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
onichols-pivotal merged pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5934
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [geode] onichols-pivotal commented on pull request #5934: GEODE-8824 fix some rule overlap and unintended singleton codeowners
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
onichols-pivotal commented on pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5934#issuecomment-765588723
> Since it looks like you are restricting the list of owners for CODEOWNERS and .asf.yml in this PR, should this have a dev list discussion?
That seems reasonable. The question was previously asked on the dev list "who owns the CODEOWNERS file" but never answered...
CODEOWNERS is currently ownerless since the syntax Robert tried didn't work. I'd like to be tagged on any modification just to review that changes are syntactically sound, minimum of 2 owners is maintained, formatting is consistent, and all owners are committers. I have no desire to interfere with any actual changes in ownership. But I would also be fine with keeping CODEOWNERS ownerless if that is perceived as the only democratic solution.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [geode] upthewaterspout commented on pull request #5934: GEODE-8824 fix some rule overlap and unintended singleton codeowners
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
upthewaterspout commented on pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5934#issuecomment-765581675
Since it looks like you are restricting the list of owners for CODEOWNERS and .asf.yml in this PR, should this have a dev list discussion?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org