[PATCH] Bug in Task CallTarget ?

[Nico Seessle <ni...@seessle.de>]

When I was using 'antcall' on Windows (NT 4.0; SP6a and W2K) it was always
trying to use a build-file <basedir>/<ant.file> wher <ant-file> already
included the full path. So I included a small check to see if ant.file
alreay includes basedir of the currently executing project and if so, remove
it.

Additionally I changed all occurences of "delegate" with "calledTarget",
since the IDE I'm using (guess which) doesn't like the word "delegate" as a
Variable-name.

Is it OK for everyone to take consideration on MS Visual J++ or should I get
the "right" IDE? (Unfortunately it's still and "error" for Visual J++ even
if you enable the switch "Enable MS Extensions").

Nico

Re: [PATCH] Bug in Task CallTarget ?

[Nico Seessle <ni...@seessle.de>]

Oops... forgot the attachement...

Sorry.

Nico
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nico Seessle" <ni...@seessle.de>
To: <an...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 1:04 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Bug in Task CallTarget ?


> When I was using 'antcall' on Windows (NT 4.0; SP6a and W2K) it was always
> trying to use a build-file <basedir>/<ant.file> wher <ant-file> already
> included the full path. So I included a small check to see if ant.file
> alreay includes basedir of the currently executing project and if so,
remove
> it.
>
> Additionally I changed all occurences of "delegate" with "calledTarget",
> since the IDE I'm using (guess which) doesn't like the word "delegate" as
a
> Variable-name.
>
> Is it OK for everyone to take consideration on MS Visual J++ or should I
get
> the "right" IDE? (Unfortunately it's still and "error" for Visual J++ even
> if you enable the switch "Enable MS Extensions").
>
> Nico
>
>