You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to olio-dev@incubator.apache.org by Shanti Subramanyam <sh...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/25 18:15:10 UTC
First build of 0.2 available - please read
The first 0.2 build is now available at
http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.2
Binary and zip files for all 3 implementations are available. The
filenames should be self-explanatory.
Release notes should be in the release directory of each binary package
(dist/release for source packages).
The rat outputs are in *rat* and again the filenames should be
self-explanatory :
$ ls *rat*
java-rat-src.out php-rat-src.out rails-rat-src.out
java-rat.out php-rat.out rails-rat.out
I need everyone's help in testing this release. Please, please do pick
up one or more packages and give it a quick run through.
Mentors - would greatly appreciate your help in verifying
correctness,legal,apache guidelines etc.
Known issues with headers:
. There are several rails plugin files that do not have headers. These
are associated with the 'stories' plugin and I couldn't find any
documentation on whether this accepts comments and if so in what format.
If we can get quick feedback on the testing and hopefully we don't have
to spin the release too many times (I'll keep my fingers crossed), let's
see if we can get this baby out by Christmas.
Thanks in advance for your help
Shanti
Re: First build of 0.2 available - please read
Posted by Shanti Subramanyam <Sh...@Sun.COM>.
If there is no further feedback, I'd like to go ahead and do the final
build for 0.2.
The only changes that have been made are to the docs and Kim has added a
script to ease setup of glassfish.
I'll put this build out by the end of the day, so please get any other
feedback in soon.
Thanks
Shanti
Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> The first 0.2 build is now available at
> http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.2
>
> Binary and zip files for all 3 implementations are available. The
> filenames should be self-explanatory.
> Release notes should be in the release directory of each binary
> package (dist/release for source packages).
>
> The rat outputs are in *rat* and again the filenames should be
> self-explanatory :
> $ ls *rat*
> java-rat-src.out php-rat-src.out rails-rat-src.out
> java-rat.out php-rat.out rails-rat.out
>
>
> I need everyone's help in testing this release. Please, please do pick
> up one or more packages and give it a quick run through.
>
> Mentors - would greatly appreciate your help in verifying
> correctness,legal,apache guidelines etc.
>
> Known issues with headers:
> . There are several rails plugin files that do not have headers. These
> are associated with the 'stories' plugin and I couldn't find any
> documentation on whether this accepts comments and if so in what format.
>
> If we can get quick feedback on the testing and hopefully we don't
> have to spin the release too many times (I'll keep my fingers
> crossed), let's see if we can get this baby out by Christmas.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
> Shanti
0.2 Rails feedback
Posted by Amanda Waite <Am...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Shanti,
Some points that need correcting in the rails_setup_kit.html
[Section] Setting up the Driver
- ' |cp samples/services/MysqlService/build/MysqlService.jar services|'
should be:
cp samples/services/MysqlService/build/MySQLService.jar
[Section] Installing the Web Application
- gem install mysql --with-mysql-lib=/usr/mysql/5.0/lib/mysql
--with-mysql-include=/usr/mysql/5.0/include
should be:
gem install mysql -- --with-mysql-lib=/usr/mysql/lib/mysql
--with-mysql-include=/usr/mysql/include
- "Upgrade your Ruby version to the latest in the
pkg.opensolaris.org/dev repository."
This will give you Rubygems 1.3.1 and Ruby 1.8.7p72" You don't need to
do this as 2009.06 has the same version. But OpenSolaris b129 has
RubyGems 1.3.5 and Ruby 1.8.7p174 and that will be available soon, so
probably change the versions on this line
- "Edit /usr/ruby/1.8/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-solaris2.11/rbconfig.rb as follows"
You don't need to do this in 2009.06 and later.
The app and driver work ok so far.
Amanda
On 25/11/2009 18:15, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> The first 0.2 build is now available at
> http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.2
>
> Binary and zip files for all 3 implementations are available. The
> filenames should be self-explanatory.
> Release notes should be in the release directory of each binary
> package (dist/release for source packages).
>
> The rat outputs are in *rat* and again the filenames should be
> self-explanatory :
> $ ls *rat*
> java-rat-src.out php-rat-src.out rails-rat-src.out
> java-rat.out php-rat.out rails-rat.out
>
>
> I need everyone's help in testing this release. Please, please do pick
> up one or more packages and give it a quick run through.
>
> Mentors - would greatly appreciate your help in verifying
> correctness,legal,apache guidelines etc.
>
> Known issues with headers:
> . There are several rails plugin files that do not have headers. These
> are associated with the 'stories' plugin and I couldn't find any
> documentation on whether this accepts comments and if so in what format.
>
> If we can get quick feedback on the testing and hopefully we don't
> have to spin the release too many times (I'll keep my fingers
> crossed), let's see if we can get this baby out by Christmas.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
> Shanti
Re: First build of 0.2 available - please read
Posted by Amanda Waite <Am...@Sun.COM>.
Just tested the Rails version again with the new build (12/5) and it
works fine.
Amanda
On 25/11/2009 18:15, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> The first 0.2 build is now available at
> http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.2
>
> Binary and zip files for all 3 implementations are available. The
> filenames should be self-explanatory.
> Release notes should be in the release directory of each binary
> package (dist/release for source packages).
>
> The rat outputs are in *rat* and again the filenames should be
> self-explanatory :
> $ ls *rat*
> java-rat-src.out php-rat-src.out rails-rat-src.out
> java-rat.out php-rat.out rails-rat.out
>
>
> I need everyone's help in testing this release. Please, please do pick
> up one or more packages and give it a quick run through.
>
> Mentors - would greatly appreciate your help in verifying
> correctness,legal,apache guidelines etc.
>
> Known issues with headers:
> . There are several rails plugin files that do not have headers. These
> are associated with the 'stories' plugin and I couldn't find any
> documentation on whether this accepts comments and if so in what format.
>
> If we can get quick feedback on the testing and hopefully we don't
> have to spin the release too many times (I'll keep my fingers
> crossed), let's see if we can get this baby out by Christmas.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
> Shanti
Re: First build of 0.2 available - please read
Posted by Shanti Subramanyam <Sh...@Sun.COM>.
If there is no further feedback, I'd like to go ahead and do the final
build for 0.2.
The only changes that have been made are to the docs and Kim has added a
script to ease setup of glassfish.
I'll put this build out by the end of the day, so please get any other
feedback in soon.
Thanks
Shanti
Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> The first 0.2 build is now available at
> http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.2
>
> Binary and zip files for all 3 implementations are available. The
> filenames should be self-explanatory.
> Release notes should be in the release directory of each binary
> package (dist/release for source packages).
>
> The rat outputs are in *rat* and again the filenames should be
> self-explanatory :
> $ ls *rat*
> java-rat-src.out php-rat-src.out rails-rat-src.out
> java-rat.out php-rat.out rails-rat.out
>
>
> I need everyone's help in testing this release. Please, please do pick
> up one or more packages and give it a quick run through.
>
> Mentors - would greatly appreciate your help in verifying
> correctness,legal,apache guidelines etc.
>
> Known issues with headers:
> . There are several rails plugin files that do not have headers. These
> are associated with the 'stories' plugin and I couldn't find any
> documentation on whether this accepts comments and if so in what format.
>
> If we can get quick feedback on the testing and hopefully we don't
> have to spin the release too many times (I'll keep my fingers
> crossed), let's see if we can get this baby out by Christmas.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
> Shanti